Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Bye-Bye Gelfand. Is It Magnus' Turn Now vs. Anand?

[Blog History]

   Now that the 2012 World Chess Championship Match is over, which to me, ends what I think was a brutal cycle, mostly culminating in the 2011 Kazan Candidates Matches but it might have originally started with Magnus Carlsen saying he wouldn't participate. That left a black cloud over the event and Alexander Grischuk's play at the board didn't help either in that tournament, which fueled much backlash once the Candidates were over. So leaving that beaten and kicked horse behind us, where do we go from here?

 

  

   The 2013 Candidates Matches will in fact this time have Magnus Carlsen to contend with, but who might not be the World #1 once the event swings around. Levon Aronian has been creeping up on Magnus' throne the many past month and he'll be looking to overthrow the Norwegian GM on his way to possibly having the match of his life vs. Anand.

 

  

   There are others though, perhaps not as in the running as Magnus and Levon but still contenders. They may not be able to win it, but they can definitely play spoiler.

   The Top 3 of the Chess World Cup; Petr Svidler, Alexander Grischuk and the erratic Vassily Ivanchuk will be present there as well. They are flanked by Vladimir Kramnik and Teimour Radjabov. Boris Gelfand will have one more chance in the sun to win it, but honestly, not against this group.

  

  

  

   The event will take place in March of 2013 and will be a DRR (Double-Round-Robin) event, hopefully to enforce players to not agree to such short draws (GRISCHUK!!!!!!! Yell)


   Here are the time controls for this event:

   The time control for each game shall be: 120 minutes for the first 40 moves, 60 minutes for the next 20 moves and then 15 minutes for the rest of the game plus an additional 30 seconds per move starting from move 61

   and some additional rules, one of them being about agreeing to draws..

and the tiebreak criteria (3.7):

   a) The results of the games between the players involved in the tie. If they are still tied:
   b) The total number of wins in the tournament of every player involved in the tie. If they are still tied:
   c) Sonneborn - Berger System.

   If there is no clear winner with the above 3 criteria, there will be a special competition between the players who still remain tied after using the 3rd criteria (Sonneborn-Berger): after a new drawing of colors, each tied player will play two (2) tie-break games with the other tied opponent(s). The games shall be played using the electronic clock starting with 25 minutes for each player with an increment of 10 seconds after each move.

   Finally we find the following (3.9.2b)

   The players cannot draw a game by agreement. A claim for a draw is permitted only through the Chief Arbiter (or his Deputy) in the cases of perpetual check, stalemate, threefold repetition, the 50-move rule or insufficient material. Other kinds of theoretical drawn positions are allowed to be claimed by one or both players through the Chief Arbiter (or his Deputy). The Chief Arbiter can then declare it, or not, as a drawn game after consulting his/her Technical Advisor.


   So what do you think could, will, or might happen? Any predictions out there in Chess.com-land? Thoughts, comments, discussions...anything?

   If you *do* leave a comment or a thought or two, just keep it clean please. Thank you and have a good night!  Cool

   -Mark

Comments


  • 12 months ago

    Gaffneychess

    I think they should use the soccer scoring system.  Draws are less common in that format, I believe.  Near the end of the tournament we might see some wild stuff for that final push.  Doubt they would adopt it, but cripes, let's get more than 2 wins for a champion!!

  • 12 months ago

    chessdoggblack

    Ivanchuk just won a "championship" title in CUBA...and if anyone is behind  the eight ball its him...watch out!Cool

  • 12 months ago

    Arctor

    Radjabov will be the next challenger, put it on the board.

  • 12 months ago

    FM gauranga

    Why get on Grischuk's case? Everyone had a fair chance to beat him, and they didn't. I wish they played a double round robin for the WC with 10-12 players.

  • 12 months ago

    drumdaddy

    Great field but I wish that Nakamura was in the mix.

  • 12 months ago

    ChessMarkstheSpot

       It was impressive, but a lot of people still went after him for it. And me live-blogging the games, well I went on him as well and even during the WCC match I'm sure I heard the commentators mention it. I don't remember if Chessbase or TWIC or anyone else was part of it but I know here he took some guff. Anyway what's done is done and we have London to look forward to.

       -Mark

  • 12 months ago

    MSC157

    Kramnik vs. Aronian still the best! :)

  • 12 months ago

    Mean-Mr-Mustard

    Why should Grischuk be blamed for drawing every game and then finally beating Aronian and Kramnik? Sounds pretty impressive to me. It's so easy for us to blame these chess players for "playing for draws," but we have no idea what it is like to play chess on the level of these guys, so it's hard for us to understand the whole situation. Sure we would like to see fighting chess in every game and I bet Grischuk would to, but Grischuk is more concerned with winning than he is with playing exciting games.

  • 12 months ago

    swineking

    Drawnand shouldn't be able to play in '14 as he ruins the sport with all the lame and coward draws. Let's hope Aronian and Carlsen one day will meet for a *real* WC match.

  • 12 months ago

    Hajmola

    hope to see magnus vs anand in 2014!

  • 12 months ago

    ChessMarkstheSpot

       Grischuk was bashed by a lot of people because of what happened and how many draws came from him and out of his games. When I was Live-Blogging the entire tourney here, my dislike for Grischuk grew everytime a quick-draw game happened. There were months of backlash about this on Chessbase, letters written to FIDE, global viewer comments and editorials...not only about him but about the system like you said which was flawed. I hope the 2013 Candidates will be much for fun to watch than the 2011 was. Live-Blogging that tournament with Grissy in it was not a fun thing to do.

       -Mark

  • 12 months ago

    davidmelbourne

    Agree with Nf8's comments about Grischuk. A professional, playing in one of the key tournaments of his life, who had a particular strategy which worked very well: avoid the prep of others and duel it out in rapids. The one time he deviated from this was in the very last, lost, game against Gelfand. 

    BTW: the next World Champion will be Aronian:)

  • 12 months ago

    GeniusKJ

    Either Carlsen or Ivanchuk will win I think. Levon has good chances too but I dont think he'll win it this time.

  • 12 months ago

    shengyi

    Hard to say; many great players.

  • 12 months ago

    kvlc

    I just hope for a better performance from Aronian this time around.  Was very disappointing to see him drop in the first round last year.

  • 12 months ago

    Nf8

    I think Grischuk shouldn't be bashed so much; the format was flawed, and in such short matches, nobody can be blamed for playing safe. Grischuk himself said that Kramnik had prepared to an incredible degree. To the average spectator it seemed like stalled boredom, but to the professional it was a very interesting and enlightening experience. Good luck to all the contenders in the next cycle...they will need it.

  • 12 months ago

    SJFG

    I hope Kramnik wins it.

Back to Top

Post your reply: