Gavinator I dont wish to argue with you again. Please stop commenting on my stuff. I've already explained how my 888 rating is based off of 5 games, hardly a substantial basis for even a provisional rating. I put that on my profile to be honest, but it looks like its just causing me grief since people take it way out of context

I have to agree that people should not offer their services unless they can play at at least 1500ELO strength

I don't see why people are going after the poor guy.

it would have both mine and Houdini's. And thank you

Yeah, let's move on. I just notice that you didn't answer the point about if the analysis would be yours of Houdini's.

In view of my actual skills and ratings, I believe I am qualified to teach U1000 players. And if you do not agree with me then I'm sorry, nothing I can do. I just want to stop arguing, its pointless and time wasting

Well, you're now charging for the analysis so not only the same reasoning applies (as to your lack of skill to be teaching anyone) but the disagreement is necessarily stronger as you're asking money for it..

As to your link. Well, you sure know what a pin is. Does that qualify you to analyze other people's games, with insights good enough to help those people progress? Or does it make an engine analysis people could get for free worth the price you're going to charge for it?

Humility here is not defend yourself against common sense, it would be recognizing your own inability to teach anything in view of your actual skills and ratings..

To those of you that disagree with this: Just know that my free analysis I was offering is closed and move on. 

I try to stay humble while defending myself, not to easy when I get attacked on here all the time.

tell me what you think of the last post here http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/great-blindfold-chess-video?lc=1#last_comment

So basically you want to charge people to feed their games to an engine and spit the resulting analysis with your own words? That's close to a scam, but that would still be the best case, because if you're actually trying to charge people to give YOUR own engine free analysis, then you're delusional about your abilities, especiallly when looking at your past games and seeing the number of mistakes and blunder you do (not even talking about your analysis of the Parham...).

If a 400 points rating gap was be a basis for coaching, it would apply to people mucher higher rated than you are, because like it or not, coaching implies a minimum set of skills that you clearly don't have. Having an engine and learning theory lines by heart without fully understanding them do not qualify as skills... Anyway, even with that standard, it would qualify you to coach U900 players, not U1000, and in online chess ratings, because if we start looking at your live chess ratings...

Your username implies that you hold some religious beliefs. If I remeber correctly, humility is a basic principle in the religion you seem to believe in. Seems like a good time to start applying this principle..

in one of the other forums a person said that a good coach level would be about 400 points higher player, meaning that I would be qualified for U1000.

This is like an obese person demanding pay for his training tips..

I'm surprised that Helzeth's comment wasn't denied by chess.com.

I can analyze to! Although I am not a titled player, I am a decent player who can still help many beginners to improve! :) I made my own blog that covers all of my services, so you can check that out too. 

the first reason is this is lower priced than most people's analysis. The second  reason is this analysis is more directed for lower rated players. 

Please explain why I should pay a 1300 rated player money for a game analysis? I can get a titled player's analysis for a low price.