10638 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hello guys! Sorry to say this, but I have been overwhelmed with live game requests. So, I am closing free analysis. However, I am still open for analysis, but it will require a small charge. My services will include detailed game analysis or 1 hour live games analyzed live and recorded. The exact pricing hasnt been figured out yet, but it will be reletively minor. I'm sorry for the inconvienience
Gavinator I dont wish to argue with you again. Please stop commenting on my stuff. I've already explained how my 888 rating is based off of 5 games, hardly a substantial basis for even a provisional rating. I put that on my profile to be honest, but it looks like its just causing me grief since people take it way out of context
I have to agree that people should not offer their services unless they can play at at least 1500ELO strength
I don't see why people are going after the poor guy.
it would have both mine and Houdini's. And thank you
Yeah, let's move on. I just notice that you didn't answer the point about if the analysis would be yours of Houdini's.
In view of my actual skills and ratings, I believe I am qualified to teach U1000 players. And if you do not agree with me then I'm sorry, nothing I can do. I just want to stop arguing, its pointless and time wasting
Well, you're now charging for the analysis so not only the same reasoning applies (as to your lack of skill to be teaching anyone) but the disagreement is necessarily stronger as you're asking money for it..
As to your link. Well, you sure know what a pin is. Does that qualify you to analyze other people's games, with insights good enough to help those people progress? Or does it make an engine analysis people could get for free worth the price you're going to charge for it?
Humility here is not defend yourself against common sense, it would be recognizing your own inability to teach anything in view of your actual skills and ratings..
To those of you that disagree with this: Just know that my free analysis I was offering is closed and move on.
I try to stay humble while defending myself, not to easy when I get attacked on here all the time.
tell me what you think of the last post here http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-analysis/great-blindfold-chess-video?lc=1#last_comment
So basically you want to charge people to feed their games to an engine and spit the resulting analysis with your own words? That's close to a scam, but that would still be the best case, because if you're actually trying to charge people to give YOUR own engine free analysis, then you're delusional about your abilities, especiallly when looking at your past games and seeing the number of mistakes and blunder you do (not even talking about your analysis of the Parham...).
If a 400 points rating gap was be a basis for coaching, it would apply to people mucher higher rated than you are, because like it or not, coaching implies a minimum set of skills that you clearly don't have. Having an engine and learning theory lines by heart without fully understanding them do not qualify as skills... Anyway, even with that standard, it would qualify you to coach U900 players, not U1000, and in online chess ratings, because if we start looking at your live chess ratings...
Your username implies that you hold some religious beliefs. If I remeber correctly, humility is a basic principle in the religion you seem to believe in. Seems like a good time to start applying this principle..
in one of the other forums a person said that a good coach level would be about 400 points higher player, meaning that I would be qualified for U1000.
This is like an obese person demanding pay for his training tips..
I'm surprised that Helzeth's comment wasn't denied by chess.com.
I can analyze to! Although I am not a titled player, I am a decent player who can still help many beginners to improve! :) I made my own blog that covers all of my services, so you can check that out too.
the first reason is this is lower priced than most people's analysis. The second reason is this analysis is more directed for lower rated players.
Please explain why I should pay a 1300 rated player money for a game analysis? I can get a titled player's analysis for a low price.
View complete profile
Instructive Amateur Games Part 1: Weakening Pawn Moves
by ChristianSoldier007 17 months ago
Defeating the Parham Part 1
by ChristianSoldier007 18 months ago
Free Analysis Closed, Analysis Still Open
by ChristianSoldier007 19 months ago
Live Game 01
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!