JamieDelarosa vs Chess.com
Dear Chess.com management,
I demand a full accounting and explanation of the correspondences and decisions between Chess.com and ex-member JamieDelarosa concerning the banning of Rhamel-Bynum. Philosophy aside, if "the proof of the pudding is in the eating" then chess.com has failed miserably, since Jamie, a fine player, contributor, administrator, distinguished member of chess.com, and all around mensch, has quit in disgust, whereas adolescent troll and wanna-be cyber terrorist Rhamel-Bynum, is still a member in good standing at chess.com. Perhaps some soul searching and re-evaluation is in order, but this incident is bigger than just the two protagonists, and will not just 'go away'. I expect to hear from you either way. I am posting this on News for my (and Jamie's) team, Israel Supporters.