Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

US Open

Hey all - just got back from the US Open in Orlando and wanted to give you a quick recap of my performance.

I decided to play this tourney very last-minute, so I chose the 4-day option.  This resulted in a strange schedule: 3 games of G/60 on both Thursday and Friday with an additional game of 40/2, SD/1 on Friday night after the section merge, followed by only 1 game on both Saturday and Sunday.  Needless to say, the 4-dayers (and there were a lot of us...including most of the GMs!) were hoping to make it through Friday intact to set themselves up for the "leisurely" weekend pace.

It's amazing how rusty one can become without a steady diet of tournament chess.  I hadn't played since the Philly Open in April, and it definitely showed.  I grappled with my calculation all tournament.  My thought process in concrete positions was all over the map.  My openings weren't up to par, and I was particularly struggling with Black.  In round 8, I easily achieved a won game vs. a player rated 400 points below me, only to reject a few "complicated" winning lines in search of the elusive "clean" win.  The result was an incredibly disappointing draw.

On the positive side, I still scored 6.5/9 with only a single loss.  Here are the games (note that a couple of the early rounds are incomplete due to the fast time control):

The damage to my FIDE and USCF ratings was mercifully minimal, so I mainly viewed this tournament as a convenient status check.  Things I will take away:
  • Need to work on calculation in positions that demand incisive play.  Don't get lazy!
  • Insisting on the "cleanest" win in a won position is a sure-fire way to let your opponent back in the game.  It's fine to allow your opponent counterplay if your decision is supported by concrete decision-making.
  • Black openings need to be strengthened.

Hopefully I'll have time to write a lengthier blog about my experiences so far in NYC (cliff notes: it's been awesome).  

Next up is the Manhattan Open, Aug. 17-21!

Comments


  • 13 months ago

    PawnPromotes

    I met Stephanie Shao in 2011 Pacific Open, she did well in U1700 section, the game she played gainst John was good enough as a 1700+ player. Shijie Chen took the first place in that section and what's even more amazing, he's now rated 2300+ with 17 official games play(he beated several FM, including a 2400+ FM); I noticed that Shijie played chess pretty good before he lived in USA, but definitely not on master level. It really shocked me how did he imrpove from a roughly class A player to 2300+ such soon.

    All hardworking smart boys and girls :)

  • 22 months ago

    markronilodevera

    IM's were awes0me and abs0lutely brilliant...  I w0nder h0w far I am in their level...  thanks men 4 sharing ur very interesting US 0pen experience... th0ugh im really curi0us what might be my el0 (c0z i never played in a t0urnament except in sch00l :)... 0n the 0ther hand im satisfied that there are l0ts 0f g00d-hearted pe0ple wh0 are willing t0 share their th0ughts 0penly... "Be blessed my friend" and g00d luck walking the path 0f a GM.

  • 22 months ago

    markronilodevera

    Cool

  • 22 months ago

    IM Fins0905

    Haha, nice spot fish_food.  During the game I actually remembered Avrukh (and other sources) mentioning 16.Bb2 c4 as giving Black good play...unfortunately I didn't realize that there was a big difference between 15...Qa5 and 15...Qb4.  The latter prevents 16.Bb2 c4 17.h3 Nge5 18.Nd4 (as in the game) because of 18...cxb3 and White is forced to take with the knight.

    I was just clearly worse with 16...Qa5 because there was no stopping Nc6 after 18.Nd4.

  • 22 months ago

    fish_food

     

    ..."now with high-quality manuals like the GM Repertoire series even much lower rated players know how to test you..."

    To elucidate on that comment: Vol. 2 of Avrukh answers black KID, Dutch, Benoni, and Grunfeld with a g3 system by white, and it is a very solid repertoire for white.

    In fact, the rnd 7 Benko gambit versus Dereque followed Avrukh's repertoire to the letter until move 15. Bc1 ...The Avrukh recommendation is 15. h3. In reply to 15. Bc1 as was played in the game, this is Avrukh's comment:

    "White should certainly avoid the following line: 15 Bc1 Qb4 16 Bb2 as Black has 16...c4 at his disposal, gaining good counter play on the queenside, Orsini - Cremon, Brazil 1999" -- Avrukh

    Obviously, in Avrukh's line, instead of 16. Bb2, white can play 16. Bd2 and c4 is not playable....but yeah, the days where one could count on crushing white with mechanical queenside pressure along the a and b files are long gone.

  • 22 months ago

    IM Fins0905

    @dpruess - Yep, the strength disparity did cross my mind.  Still, I rely on a couple openings with Black that are just very risky to venture these days.  5 years ago only GMs would pose me real problems in these lines...now with high-quality manuals like the GM Repertoire series even much lower rated players know how to test you...

    @AntiMaterje - I was slightly worse in the endgame vs. Doran.  He got into time pressure and blundered a rook.

    @terfand - Mm40 answered it.

    @Teamwillow - Thanks man!

  • 22 months ago

    Mm40

    terfand, 15. b4 in the first game doesn't win a piece because of 15...Bxd4, where the best move is 16. exd4. If 16. bxa5, then 16...Bxe3+ wins back the queen and an extra pawn.

    So you'll be in Manhattan in two weeks? Nice to know there'll be a chess.com presence beyond just me!

  • 22 months ago

    terfand

    why not 15. b4 in game 1?

  • 22 months ago

    Matriksi

    How did u win the second game the one against Doran, Jonathan?  His position looks better.  Was it on time?  Time control 1 hr right?

  • 22 months ago

    IM dpruess

    hey John,

    glad you had time for a tournament. rustyness is painful, so it's good to keep it at bay! one quick thought about your black vs white openings: all three of your games with black were against masters, whereas your games with white were against way lower-rated players. this may have contributed to the impression that your black openings needed work?

    your other two take-away points look like good ideas :)

Back to Top

Post your reply: