Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Staunton Chess Pieces



     We often play chess and get so into the game that we don't think about the tools of the chess player. By tools, I mean the pieces, board, clocks, etc. I have heard the term Staunton Pattern a lot in my travels through the world of chess. I decided to do a bit of research and here's what I found.

     Obviously, the pieces had to be named after someone, so I did some quick investigation. The man the pieces were named after was Howard Staunton (1810-1874). Staunton was a Shakespeparean scholar and chess jounalist. The Englishman wrote the Chess Player's Handbook. He came to fame through his 21 game match against Pieere Saint-Amant, which he won. Unfortunately, the match was an unofficial event, so Staunton receceived no official title. However, to many Englishmen he is considered the closest thing to a world champion that England had seen. It was something else he did that cemented his name into the chess history book, he gave his name to the registered trademark of a standardized design for chess pieces, the same one's that bear his name to this day.

     We dont' think much about standardized piece design these days, but certainly would if there was not a standardized set used in tournaments. Without a "standard" we would show up at any given tournament to find a vast array of different styles and sizes of pieces. This can be confusing (at least to me). I need to see similar pieces when I play because I am so used to seeing the tournament set that sits on my coffee table. The reason for standardized pieces goes way beyond my pickiness. Players from around the world need to be able to recognize each of the pieces, leaving them to concentrate on tactics rather than piece identification!

     This matter was quickly resolved in the 1840's by the John Jaques game company of London. The design relied upon existing styles as it's basis, yet with a feel and look of the age. The design was officially registered in 1849 by Nathaniel Cook. He is considered responsible for the final design. However, some chess scholars attribute his brother-in-law, John Jaques as the final architect of this design.

     The key design changes are most seen in a few primary areas. The primary rings around the bases were dropped to one and replaced (in the case of the Bishop, Queen, and King) with smaller, cleaner rings below the Mitre, Coronet, and Crown. The base diameter was increased and lead weights added to a hollowed out bottom for stability.

     Probably the most beautiful addition was in the modelling of the Knight. The horse head of the Knight is based on the horse's head  found on the Parthenon's Frieze, which is part of the Elgin Marbles. The Elgin Marbles ere created in ancient Greece by Phidias. Out of all the possible choices of a horse's head one could choose, I think the designer choose the cleanest example possible. Take a good look at a piece and then look at the same work from the Elgin Marbles.

     These peices were made popular by the pure genius of adding Staunton's name via an endorsement. This was an endorsement for which Staunton was paid a percentage from every set sold. This may be one of the first examples of a sports-like endorsement. This set has passed the test of time. It is the only set recognized by the World Chess Federation for regulation play. There are slight variations to the basic Staunton design, but it has certainly passed the test of time.

     Today, tournament sets are made of plastic since it's cheap and stands up to wear well. However, the finest tradition sets (that I cannot afford to buy) tend to be made of boxwood and ebony. The next time you pick up a chess piece, take a look at the design and enjoy the sublte details worked into it. You should think about these things now and again. It's kind of like stopping to smell the roses (as they say).

Comments


  • 7 years ago

    Hugh_T_Patterson

    Thanks for the additional information batgirl. I will keep it in my notes and eventually get around to making the corrections! As for it being an addiction, there are far worse things to be addicted to!
  • 7 years ago

    erik

    thank you for sharing!
  • 7 years ago

    batgirl

    Very nice summary - both fairly complete and well written. 

    But watch out; chess history can get addictive.

     

    If you go to Chessopedia (on this site) there is some additional information of the Staunton pattern, including a design picture from that era.

     

    One teeny-tiny, almost insignificant, and probably irrelevant correction: the match between Staunton and Saint-Amant (the second of 2 matches - the first, shorter and less formal match was won by Saint-Amant by a slight margin) was quite an official event. But it wasn't a match to determine a world champion (which is what I think you are saying).

     

    If it is of interest, you can even read the wonderful George Walker's account of that match (with some background information) at The Late Grand Chess Match

     

    It'll be a good addiction test, at any rate.

  • 7 years ago

    thetimetraveller

    Hugh, thanks for the nice piece of research, it's always worthwhile looking back at Jaques and Staunton's legacy.  Of course back then there was no official World Championship but as I understand it Staunton was unofficially acknowledged to be the best player at the time.  Though he has been better respected for his analysis skills, and a style which anticipated more modern players to follow.

     

    I have a couple of Staunton's books (The Chess Player's Handbook, The Chess Player's Companion) and his three volume annotated Pearson's Shakespeare. All are very readable, which is fortunate as I am a Shakespeare fan as well as a chess player Cool

     

    If you can get a second hand copy of 'Howard Staunton - the English world chess champion' by R.D. Keene and R.N. Coles, I think you'd find it interesting.

     

     

Back to Top

Post your reply: