Q & A With Dan Heisman featuring NM Dan Heisman is OPEN to ALL MEMBERS! Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Openings directories

 

 

Strongest chess play­ers in their in­ter­views em­pha­size on the im­por­tance of the open­ings in the mod­ern chess. This mat­ter is so cru­cial on the top level that up to 100% of their chess train­ings are ded­i­cat­ed to prepar­ing of open­ings vari­a­tions. All other as­pects of the chess mas­ter­ship (such as: strate­gic un­der­stand­ing, endgames, study­ing of clas­si­cal games etc.) were sup­posed to be stud­ied at the be­gin­ning of their chess car­ri­ers. Now, only open­ings, open­ings, open­ings…

But these talks are about top play­ers. What should do less ex­pe­ri­enced play­ers who just at his/her start? Of course im­por­tance of open­ings knowl­edge is not so huge there. Even if they get win­ning po­si­tion from the very open­ing it does not mean he/she will win this game. That’s why I am strong­ly con­vinced that play­ers up to level 2400-2500 should not sac­ri­fice all their chess time only for open­ings. Books by Nimt­zovich, Dvoret­sky, Aa­gard, Alekhine and many-many oth­ers could be (and should be) stud­ied. As well, mas­ter­ship of anal­y­sis is a good key for long-last­ing REAL im­prove­ment.

But this idea does not mean that you should for­get about open­ings train­ings ab­so­lute­ly. I offer to spend less time on open­ings in order to in­vest saved time in the real chess im­prove­ment. Giv­ing my on­line and of­fline lessons I have seen that prob­lem of build­ing up an open­ing reper­toire is both im­por­tant and chal­leng­ing. A lot of play­ers can not use Chess­Base and Rybka prop­er­ly. Open­ings books they buy in­clude a lot of ma­te­ri­al and to de­fine what im­por­tant and what not is a prob­lem since its re­solv­ing re­quires an ex­pe­ri­ence or some­body’s ad­vice.

That’s why I start­ed to help my stu­dents cre­at­ing files for them in the open­ings they were in­ter­est­ed in more of all. I do not tell these files helped them to re­solve all their prob­lems. But they pro­vide them with the basis of that or an­oth­er line. As well, op­po­site to mul­ti­ple videos that are post­ed in the in­ter­net, you can save my files (in cbv or pgn for­mat) and use them in fu­ture when­ev­er you need with­out any prob­lems.

What do my files in­clude? I put there main lines and ref­er­ences to im­por­tant games. Of course I pro­vide this ma­te­ri­al with word ex­pla­na­tions where this is re­quired in my opin­ion. The main goal I am fol­low­ing is do not over­load files with extra ma­te­ri­al. When­ev­er you are need­ed to pre­pare a con­crete line for a con­crete game you can just look at such file and get a re­quired ap­proach.

My files are very con­ve­nient for using. You can both watch them on com­put­er screen and print out pgn file and look vari­a­tions on the board. As well, when­ev­er you see some good game played in al­ready ex­ist­ing line, you can just add it to that file. Also you can add there your games played by these vari­a­tions.

The level of play­ers I try to be ori­en­tat­ed on is very dif­fer­ent: from 1500 to 2400. Of course, files will be use­ful not equal­ly for them but I am sure they will be! As well, I offer an email-sup­port for lines that are put to my files. If you down­load­ed the file and you have some ques­tions about some con­crete po­si­tion or what­ev­er – just send me an email and I will help you.

If you are enough encouraged with all this - welcome to my new page http://chesstao.com/openings.php

If you have any questions I will happily assist you!


Comments


  • 2 years ago

    markronilodevera

    eiwa

  • 2 years ago

    GM LuckyTiger

    hicetnunc, I think the main worry there is that after 2.Qe2 Black plays 2...c5 and what then? looks like we played sicilian with 2.Qe2. Very strange. After 2.d3d5 - 3.Qe2 looks more natural. At least we create some threats (to take on d5 and to play Nc3). If you play 2.Qe2 c5 3.c3 Black replies with 3...Nc6 4. Nf3 (to support d2d4) Nf6 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4d5 7.e5Ne4 with comfortable position (Q on e2 is placed awkard). that's my opinion.

  • 2 years ago

    hicetnunc

    I'm interested by one of your repertoire files, namely 1.e4 e6 2.d3 d5 3.Qe2, but I have a question and would like to know if you answer it in the file (or maybe you can answer it directly here ?) : what's the advantage of this move-order over the immediate 2.Qe2 ?

    • 2.Qe2 keeps the option to play c3+d4 in some variations (for example 2...c5)
    • 2.Qe2 makes 2...d5 more difficult (3.exd5) 

    Or is it that by delaying Qe2, white wants to provoke the ...d5 push, because KIA set-ups are more efficient against the e6/d5 structure ? Surprised

Back to Top

Post your reply: