Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Judy

 

Rod Edwards, the developer of the EDO historical rating, has uncovered some interesting information. We're all familiar with Mrs. Worrall, Mrs. Showalter, Mrs. Baird, Mrs. Gilbert and even Miss Amalie Paulsen, but before any one these 19th century ladies gained the chess spotlight, there was Judy.

   What we know of Judy is spotty and comes from limited and selective sources, the best being from Howard Staunton.  She corresponded with Mr. Staunton and with his publications using the simple moniker, "Judy," (and later, "Stella") and it seems quite possible that he knew her or had at least met her.   She was a first-rank player (in correspondence as was common with ladies in those days - circa 1850) and a first-class problemist in both creating and solving difficult problems. 

I would encourage everyone to read Mr. Edward's far fuller, and well-researched account, Judy, a Forgotten Genius of the 1850s, at the Chess Cafe Skittles Room.

Since Chess Cafe only features the current article in the Skittles Room
Part 1 can be found in the Skittles Room Archives.
Part 2 can be found in the  Skittles Room.

When a new article is featured in the Skittles Room, then both parts of the Judy article will be found in the Skittles Room Archives.

For more on retro-ratings, including EDO see my Journal entries - Retro-Rating and EDO  - and of course, Mr. Edwards' EDO site.

____________________________________________________

Correction (11/07/08)
Mr. Edwards reminded me, and rightfully so, that although I listed the games as correspondence games, their exact nature was never specified.  The fact that women of the 19th century were far more active in correspondence chess than in OTB play was the basis for my assumption.
               

  
Here are four correspondence games by "Judy"

The following two games are the same game with the second one replayed from move 16 after Judy gave her opponent a "takeback."

Comments


  • 5 years ago

    chawil

    Good games, thanks. Makes you wonder who 'Lady B' was, doesn't it?

  • 5 years ago

    RetGuvvie98

    Thanks for sharing these with us all, Batgirl.

  • 5 years ago

    Housewrecker

    Great post!

  • 5 years ago

    oginschile

    Very nice find, and beautiful games (the fourth didn't load for me... i will reload the page later.. .but the first three were quite beautiful).

    I keep trying to answer to myself why these little tidbits of history are so interesting. I can't quite formulate an answer. Beyond interesting, they often seem important to know in some way.. but again I can't quite express exactly why.

    But again.. thank you for continuing to open our eyes to these gems!

     

    Perhaps I just find it fascinating that these people put up games/tournament results/writings etc that were real accomplishments and I find are really worth remembering. Tal once said of Nezhmetdinov that tournament tables and results are often forgotten and the drama of tournaments negated through time (i'm paraphrasing here) but the beauty of individual games stand as monuments to great players through time.

    I like to remember great players, or even great people who did great things.

Back to Top

Post your reply: