Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Sarah's School of Manners

 

As some of you know, I'm strictly a blitz player anymore. As such, I play at places where blitz games are easy to find. Right now, I mostly play at Gameknot which offers 1 (one) kind of blitz - 10/0, no ratings (removing all incentive to cheat) and a simple, clean interface with a small area for chatting, plus it pairs up players automatically. No recording of games, a few bugs (such as no automatic draws for insufficient material or threefold repetition, or occasionally it won't let you legally castle) and a few other minor drawbacks keep it from rising form a good site to an excellent one.  I would estimate that 80%-90% of my games are against opponents I never see again.

 

People play under the cloak of anonymity. Being anonymous allows folks to act in ways they may never act face-to-face (hopefully, they don't). I will submit that most of those I meet are honorable and pleasant, but a too-large percentage aren't. This may be one of the comes-with-the-territory facts of life on the internet that we just have to deal with, but chess, of all games, should be one of honor, respect and, well, good manners.

 

I've been thinking of things I've  personally encountered while playing at chess that I find distasteful and decided to make a do or don't list. None of these things really make a great deal of difference, except that they affect adversely what should be a pleasurable experience from sharing some time with a stranger.

  • Do finishe every game. If you're losing, resign or play to mate. Disconnecting doesn't change the result, especially where no ratings are involved.
  • Don't say "gg" when you've gained a clear advantage, particularly after your opponent has blundered, as if the game were already over. I can't count the number of times this has back-fired, since we're all prone to blunders and mouse-slips, and I've won those lost games.
  • Don't call me names. When you lose, don't call me "b**ch," and when you win, don't call me  "stupid b**ch."
  • Don't make Batman jokes. I haven't heard an original one in 9 years and I really don't know most of the references anyway.
  • Do feel free to chat. I like clever repartee, but
  • Don't expect me to forsake the (short-timed) game to type nonsense and
  • Don't ask for my email address or phone number. I don't know you.
  • Don't ask for a draw on the first move. It's insulting and I'll resign on the offer.
  • Do mention if you have a mouseslip. I'll offer a draw if you want to simply end the game and start a worthwhile one.
  • Don't ask for a takeback. There are few takebacks in life and none in chess. 
  • Don't bother winning a blitz game by making nonsense moves just force me to use up my time (when I'm way behind in time with a totally won game) to win on time. Resign a lost position, mate with a won position or tie up the game with complexities. Winning on time is fine and a part of the game. Winning only on time isn't winning.

 

I'll probably think of more later.

 

Comments


  • 5 years ago

    Arby

    This is an interesting list.

     

    I agree; “gg” is best used when you’ve lost the game.

     

    I would allow “take-backs” though, but I wouldn’t ask for one.

     

    As for the time-factor (the making of nonsensical moves) - most players that I’ve met on blitz; do tend to use that as a tool to win a game that I could’ve clearly won. It’s part of the Blitz thing I guess, even if it’s an OTB game.


  • 6 years ago

    AlecKeen

  • Don't say "gg" when you've gained a clear advantage, particularly after your opponent has blundered, as if the game were already over. I can't count the number of times this has back-fired, since we're all prone to blunders and mouse-slips, and I've won those lost games.  - Batgirl
  •  

    Too true. A week or two ago I was playing a pretty good player who offered me a draw. I had a sneaking feeling I could still win, so I analysed the position every which way and concluded the probability was 90-95% a draw. However, I saw a slight chance which necessitated playing on three or four moves to see which option he would take at that point. Every way I analysed it the next couple of moves would be (me playing white) 1. Qf6 Rf7 2. Qd8... and follow on from there. Consequently I declined the draw and played Qf6. Some time later I revisited the game and saw that, sure enough, his rook was on f7, so I forthwith played Qd8. More time elapsed, and when I again visited the game, shockhorror!, my queen had disappeared and a strange knight was sitting on her square. How come? I checked back and saw that my opponent had not played Rf7 but Nf7. I had seen what I wanted to see, a piece on f7, and had moved my queen accordingly. I resigned immediately.

     

    The irony was that my opponent's move Nf7 was a palpable blunder, and should have resulted in my mopping up the game in 15-20 moves, hence my initial decision to refuse the draw had been vindicated. His play up to then had been exemplary, so I assumed he would be unlikely to make many errors. I was hoping he might make a slight misjudgement 2 or 3 moves later on, but had expected a player of his calibre to realise the only sound move was Rf7. Never underestimate an opponent, but never overestimate him either.

  • 6 years ago

    hutter

    Yuo must be a nice person. With respect.
  • 6 years ago

    AlecKeen

    This relates more to slower games than to blitz.

    Don't send a string of messages to your opponent on the lines of "Play"; "Play, will you", or its equivalent in Spanish, Russian or whatever, every five minutes at the start of a game, just because he hasn't responded to your opening move (or, for that matter, hasn't yet made his opening move where he's playing white). He has 1/2/3/5/7/14 days (delete as appropriate). to make that move. It's rude and totally out of line with chess etiquette. Most of these messages emanate from players under the age of 20, though the odd older one slips through. It's also bad psychology, as it just psyches me up to take them apart - slowly (just like Ali).

    I wouldn't worry too much about abuse. It shows you've got them rattled.

  • 6 years ago

    unluckythirtyfive

    Hi. This is for the most part a great list, except there is one thing I have a problem with:

    "Don't bother winning a blitz game by making nonsense moves just force me to use up my time (when I'm way behind in time with a totally won game) to win on time. Resign a lost position, mate with a won position or tie up the game with complexities. Winning on time is fine and a part of the game. Winning only on time isn't winning."

     Actually, winning on time IS winning. If you didn't want the threat of losing on time, don't play blitz. Playing the clock in blitz chess is almost as important as the actual game that is going on.

    As I said before, other than that, good list.

  • 6 years ago

    knetfan

    Vinodagnihotri wrote: 

    "I like to chat during longs games though. I think it gives a chance to understand the person and his/her style of the game. I usually tell the rationale of moves I made and what alternatives I had in mind and also like to know what would have been a better alternative in his/her opinion... Does anyone else do it?"

     

    The type of chat Vinodagnihotri describes is exactly the type of chat that I do not want to occur during a rated game.  However, I very much encourage this type of chat immediately after the game.  Also, if the game is unrated, then it can be very helpful for the reasons Vinodagnihotri describes.

    May I suggest to Chess.com to introduce a button to "invite discussion of game" with the opponent at the conclusion, along with "request a rematch" from the opponent?  For those opponents who are silent throughout the game, this button would indicate their willingness to discuss before they lose their cyberspace connection to their opponent.

     

    Thanks for the list, Sarah.  It is simple and thoughtful.

  • 6 years ago

    lostapiece

    ok i feel some anger here, i like the list agree with it ,some people use gg win or lose as an expression of thanks, an off the cuff remark .... you still frighten me though !!   Innocent
  • 6 years ago

    chessiq

    I have always assumed that "gg" means "good game".
  • 6 years ago

    Eugen

    A very funny list! Thougt I also don't know what "gg" means (one of my opponents also wrote it to me before resigning), but I think almost all members of chess.com are polite and nice and nobody would say "b**ch" to you here.
  • 6 years ago

    vinodagnihotri

    Sarah, I like your list and respect it. I didn't understand what "gg" means... 

    I am not sure if people will really have time to chat in the blitz games. I like to chat during longs games though. I think it gives a chance to understand the person and his/her style of the game. I usually tell the rationale of moves I made and what alternatives I had in mind and also like to know what would have been a better alternative in his/her opinion... Does anyone else do it?

  • 6 years ago

    andy

    Great list, Sarah. I've run into that "gg" one before; I had a guy say "gg" after I lost a rook, but I still won the game :)
  • 6 years ago

    Bonzlibir

    I really like the list Madam. But with due respect If I may add, Don't be a snob. If your opponent is trying to open a sensible conversation it will be pretty annoying if you don't respond.
  • 6 years ago

    chessiq

    "Don't ask for a takeback. There are few takebacks in life and none in chess." - my favorite on the list!

    Nice list! I am sure you mean everything on the list! 

  • 6 years ago

    erik

    great list!

    by the way, what is your phone number? ;)

  • Back to Top

    Post your reply: