Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Traps - Pt.2

There are several good reasons why studying traps might be considered  important. First, of course, to avoid becoming a victim of one.  Second is to recognize the opportunity of gaining a quick victory.  But the third reason is the best one, I believe: since traps, by their very nature, are not at all obvious and take advantage of poor play (particularly, though not exclusively, in the openings), understanding how traps work reveal to us certain secret tactical truths in postions that we may never have learned on our own. 

The last reason is as obvious as the first:  they are fun!
 

For this posting I've selected traps that are from actual historic games.

.

.

Muzio Trap

.

.

.

.

 

Alekhine's Defense Trap

.

.

.

.

 

French Defense Trap

.

.

.

.

French Defense Trap

.

.

.

.

Center Game Trap

.

.

.


Part 1

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    mtmaculot

    nice trap..

  • 2 years ago

    tristan7

    Smile

  • 2 years ago

    jaycsa

    nice

  • 3 years ago

    Praphull

    In Alkhine defence after 11.Rd8+  Kxd8 12.Nxf7 and white sets a fork between the black king and queen.

  • 3 years ago

    zaverinavya

    wateralch,if Qxb then Nd3 and the queen and king are forked.if Kxb then Nxe4 .the traps are very intersting.

  • 3 years ago

    DENVERHIGH

    DENVER
  • 3 years ago

    WaterAlch

    I am really glad I got a chance to look at your blog, but I am confused where the trap is on the center game.

  • 3 years ago

    nod

    nice

  • 5 years ago

    ciiiip

    i dont understand why Rattman resigned, sure he loses a queen but the diffrence between them is not that big

  • 5 years ago

    knghtnolram

    Nice traps. Might as well prepare for them both ways: for my use or for my opponent's use.

    :-)

  • 5 years ago

    postaljester

    good article :)

  • 5 years ago

    ADK

    These traps setup the BIG 1-2-3 K.O. punch!!!

    ADK

  • 5 years ago

    batgirl

    After being offered a bishop, of course you look to see why, and in this case, i'm not it matters why - but anticipating that offer is another story altogether.
    I think Black is just as totally lost after Qa4 as after QxB, just in a different manner.  QxB just leads to a slight, but significant enough (i.e. losing) material deficit (25-27) while Qa4 leads to a ruined position after Qf3 forks f7 and b7, followed by Nc3 joining in the attack with force. Which is why I think the rather oblique 10. Bg5 is the remarkable move and the least obvious.  Of course, I'm an expert on neither positional chess nor tactical chess, so my opinion could be way off (but I've never let such minor details hamper my voicing it).

  • 5 years ago

    erik

    yeah, but when somebody offers up the bishop like that you have to take a hard look :) after Qa4 then Qf3 and black is still in trouble, but not totally lost.

  • 5 years ago

    batgirl

    Well, 10. Bg5 was (in my opinion) the surprise move and it wasn't all that obvious.  Years ago Gary Lane, then of Chess Life, wrote that, contrary to what most people seem to think,  generally speaking, the quality of correspondence games (on the master level) was no better than that of OTB games (on the master level) and tactics are rather personal (I said that) insofar as different people see (or don't see) different tactical possibilities.

  • 5 years ago

    erik

    how did Rattman miss that in a correspondence game???

Back to Top

Post your reply: