Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Annotated Miniature 1: Mayet - Anderssen

Studying miniatures has many benefits. First, almost always, the winner wins quickly because the loser did something (really bad) that s/he should not have done in the opening. Second, related to the first reason, one learns what not to do. Third, related to the first and the second, one learns how to finish off a game when an opponent misplays the opening. Fourth, miniatures do not take as much time as longer games to analyze or go over. Fifth, miniatures are usually tactical in nature, thus one gets to see tactics in (game) action. Sixth, one can easily replay the whole game from memory. [I think there are benefits to that.] Last, but not least, they are exciting [at least to me].
Here is a game between Mayet and Anderssen that I have annotated. The latter was one of the best-attacking players of his time. Your comments, ideas, and thoughts are welcome.

Comments


  • 18 months ago

    ArnesonStidgeley

    11gxf3 does seem to hold for White - a pity

  • 4 years ago

    chessiq

    thendricks, you are probably right - [hence the "we learn what to avoid" bit in the intro]. I just wanted to point out that there are a ton of GrandMaster games that are miniatures. Even Kasparov lost in about 15 moves. These people are not amateurs Surprised

  • 4 years ago

    thendricks

    I agree w/ your analysis of miniatures. However, I believe they primarily help the beginning to intermediate player try to avoid blunders.

  • 4 years ago

    chessiq

     batgirl, you bring up a good point about the aesthetic beauty when the advantage is not easily discernable. I had to think a little bit about what you meant, and I think I got it. [I will look for the that element in future posts.]

    wubowen100, your variation is interesting. However, there is another way to defend against 5...Qg5. For example, instead of playing 6.Nf3, White could play 6.d4 with the following possible continuation

    6......Qxg2

    7.Qf3 Qxf3

    8.Nxf3 and White only loses a pawn instead of a minor piece. The game is far from over at this point.

  • 4 years ago

    wubowen100

    Qg5 is much better

    )

  • 4 years ago

    batgirl

     Was he toying with his opponent ?

    Anderssen's conception is a far more beautiful (and quicker) mate.

  • 4 years ago

    batgirl

    I totally agree with your assessment of miniatures. Beyond what you mentined, I think there is a certain aesthetic beauty to the better ones, particularly where the advantage isn't easily discernable.

    Thanks for the game.

  • 4 years ago

    chessiq

    defrancis7, nice catch! I had transposed/switched the colors. I have fixed the error. Many thanks for pointing that out.

  • 4 years ago

    defrancis7

    The annotation for move 12.  ...   Bxf2 says that Black resigned since White had a forced 3 or 4 move mate.  My analysis may be in error; but, I see the following as a forced win for Black:  13.  Rxf2  Rh1+   14.  Kxh1  Qd1+   15.  Qe1  Qxd1+  16.  Rf1  Qxf1#.

    Dee

  • 4 years ago

    ADK

    Nice! I should really get back on my blogging again. : )

    ADK

  • 4 years ago

    chessiq

    Macaoui & Philipper, thanks! Glad you liked it.

  • 4 years ago

    Philipper

    very interesting article with good annotations! thanks

  • 4 years ago

    macaoui

    very good one, thx for sharing!

Back to Top

Post your reply: