Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

eliminating contradictions

Sometimes we act against our own best interests.

We can do this both knowingly and unknowingly.

We are driven by twin desires:

1/ to keep that which we have

2/ to attain that which we have not

Our problems occur when these two things are mutually exclusive.

ie. I am playing in an online tournament against strong players

6 of the 10 games will go the same way.

I will fall over my shoelaces trying to create space whilst defending my pieces.

After about 15 moves (avg. all games), I noticed this pattern and decided to combat it. I went all out in the most open remaining games.

In one of the games it was like instant karma. As soon as I decided not to defend material at the expense of space my opponent resigned. Whereas when I decided to try and control both space and material against another my opponent tore me to pieces. it was a very good leason.

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    Reyth

    That reminds me that I also read recently that the best defense is as much of an offense as possible.

    Its really a subtle thing that Soltis taught, where our priorities are finding OUR most forceful moves and THEN figuring out how our opponent will deal will them.  Its a subtle pyschological shift that creates a huge difference in our game huh?

  • 3 years ago

    colmbuckley

    Yes. The idea is to try and follow through with a plan. Whereas this contradiction tends to tie my hands.

  • 3 years ago

    Reyth

    Wow nice post.  GM Andrew Soltis points out that chess is a game that is governed by the use of force, and so he recommends trying to make the most forceful moves you can each turn.

    It sounds like, in essence, this is what you have done.  Is that right?

Back to Top

Post your reply: