Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Outside of Theory

After yesterday's tussle in a mainline, today my opponent lead me far off the beaten paths. GM Sebastien Mazé of France is a nice guy with a fun chess style: he plays all kinds of different stuff! I could tell from playing through a few of his games yesterday that this was another player who seldom, if ever, studied opening theory. And as expected, we had a very fresh game:

In the post-mortem, both Sebastien and Sam were telling me that h6 is a major mistake. I would never have thought of that, because I thought white had spent time playing h3, I could afford to play h6 to preserve my bishop if I wanted. But my opponent created one problem for me after another. I noticed that during the first 8 moves or so, Sebastien spent a lot more time than I. I was thinking about the position as well of course, including on his time, but I did not look at as many concrete ideas as he did, thinking of things in a bit more of an "idea" way. And that was perhaps part of how he managed to outplay me in that phase.

Tomorrow is the rest day for everyone here except Carlsen and Bologan, and those fanatical enough to play a blitz tournament on their rest day. To me that seems like it would defeat the purpose, so I'm planning to walk around the town, and perhaps jump into the Lake.

Then at midnight (in Switzerland), it'll be time for Death-Match 7!! Exciting!

Comments


  • 11 months ago

    Petrosianic

    exceptionally instructive game and analysis.  Thanks David, and hope you enjoy Biel.

  • 11 months ago

    IM dpruess

    yes, the problem i described where you keep switching plans because something is wrong, but inevitably you are playing something that you have thought less about, so there's a good chance something is wrong with it too. this is a very common problem for people at pretty much every level, i believe. obviously it doesn't happen to me every game, but once you fall into it, it's hard to get out and save the game.

  • 11 months ago

    hicetnunc

    Hi David,

    Thank you for your very honest commentary. It's rare to read things like what you say on the 11th move, but this is a very genuine experience for OTB players, and it's good to see that even you titled players feel like this sometimes.

  • 11 months ago

    IM dpruess

    thanks, mobidi. i do also try to play logical chess. i've studied Botvinnik's games with his own comments, and i saw Carlsen's game yesterday.

  • 11 months ago

    mobidi

    @ dpruess-This instructive case (in Your game ) is good example of "TOO NICE CHESS"-i'm talking about.Complicated thinking-very often ,is weak thinking.Greatest chess thinkers,like Lasker,Botvinnik are talking about "logical chess game" -and they are opponents of "TOO NICE THINKING"Foot in Mouth.Carlsen is very nice "SIMPLE!" player now .Just look at his game vs Bologan.Magnus played like greate Rubinstein (he was one of the "simplest" players in the history-father of moder chess-technic).(open"a" file -active Rook a2!,a1!-and VICTORY!-Chess-academy for his OLDER opponent!Wink.Good Luck!

  • 11 months ago

    IM dpruess

    i was thinking that his h3 move, and move order in general, might not be the best, and therefore i could aim for something a bit ambitious myself (preserving my light-squared bishop, advancing e5 using tactics).

  • 11 months ago

    mobidi

    Too much IMPROVISATIONS. of course -chess is NICE GAME,but sometimes-it is "TOO NICE"Frown.Remember Botvinnik,my friends....or Carlsen.

  • 11 months ago

    IM dpruess

    did you see the variation in the game viewer?

  • 11 months ago

    JMraz

    cannot see exactly what happens if 21. .. gxh5?

  • 11 months ago

    kiwi_overtherainbow

    *admires the game of chess*

  • 11 months ago

    IM dpruess

    yes, but it's terrible. i don't want to play bad moves!

  • 11 months ago

    Eventhorizon

    1.Knf3 Knf6 2.Rg1 is another (very) early try, the opening also reminds me of Grobs Attack 1.g4 and some situations arising from there.

  • 11 months ago

    Daeru

    Very unusual ideas (to me at least) in an unusual opening. Thanks for the analysis!

Back to Top

Post your reply: