Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Definition of Endgame

My personal definition of Endgame is when the pieces for either side total 8 points or less.  Thus, each player may have a rook at most as far as heavy pieces are concerned, and one minor piece in addition to the rook.  One of the most frequently seen endings which fits this definition is rook and bishop with pawns vs rook and knight with pawns.

I was glad to see Glenn Flear's book come out in 2007 titled Practical Endgame Play because it covered endgames which fit my defintion, and a few more types as well.  

When does the endgame tend to begin in terms of move number?  I have noticed chess games typically reach an ending with 8 points or less worth of material in pieces on a move number in the 30s.

My investigation of endings has benefitted me greatly, however...

Although at one time I was heavily dedicated to studying endings, I have decided to study endings and tactics in equal proportion.  My reasoning is that either a well played ending or a well played tactic can basically end the game just the same.

Comments


  • 12 months ago

    ghostofmaroczy

    That is a sticky wicket, Daeru.  If I expanded my definition, then I would have to include 3 minor pieces, which I don't want to include.  

    The funny thing is, I used to have an intentionally inconsistent personal definition of ending where I indeed considered purified queen endings as falling within the definition.  It was a two-part definition: 8 points or less or one piece only.

    Thank you, Daeru, for always punching holes in my ideas!  It keeps me honest.

  • 12 months ago

    Daeru

    Good points but don't you consider queen "endgames" as endgames? 

Back to Top

Post your reply: