Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

"Pawn break in the center, stronger is !"

John was a bit nervous today. For the very first time, he was going to play a game against his mentor, a long game, with clocks and all the regular stuff. Of course, it wasn’t his first competitive game : since he had decided to take advantage of his student’s years to become a fierce chess player, he had played in many OTB tournaments, not counting the hundreds of training games on the Internet. He could already boast a hefty class rating, that was steadily increasing, thanks to his daily tactical training and good focus at the board. John had even managed to draw with a couple of experts players. Last time, he could even had won, but his opponent managed to escape in a pawn down rook endgame, which he drew effortlessly despite being in time-trouble.

However, John had never played against a master level player. He wasn’t even sure what was the level of his mentor. Was he an IM ? Eben higher ? Some old chap he had met at the chess club had told him that his mentor had been a very strong competitor in the 70’s. The rumour was that he was acquainted with the secrets of the famous Russian chess school, though nobody knew what this meant exactly.

John had hired his mentor as a coach only one month ago. His friend had told him that the old mentor may not accept to take him as a student, as he was quite selective and didn’t want to lose his time with all these young “I will be GM in 5 years” fellows, who quit as soon as they were asked to annotate one of their games without Fritz’s help… During their first lesson , the mentor handed John a dozen of positions and asked him to analyze them in 45 minutes. Then he sat and waited. John started with what seemed like the easiest ones, but it turned out none of them were easy. Still he focused hard, and tried his best to crack them. After the 45 minutes, he had solved like 9 out of 12. His mentor asked him to give the variations. “Shall I put the first position on the chessboard ?” asked John. “- This won’t be necessary”.  John was giving his variations and the mentor replied with some unexpected “and what if black plays 4…h6 instead of taking ?” Actually, they spend more than 1 hr going through all 12 exercises, and John felt exhausted like he had played a long game. The mentor accepted him as a student. “You try hard, that’s good”, he said.

In the next lesson, they reviewed the rook ending against the expert. His mentor pointed out a few key positions and principles and gave him many exercises. “To do against a friend, with clock at the club !”. At this occasion, John realized his clubmates didn’t know much about rook endings.

So there he was, adjusting the white pieces (he won the toss), and determined to do his best. He had had a good night sleep, and hadn’t spent too much time on chess in the morning, as he preferred to go to the swimming pool before playing.

He pushed his d pawn and pressed the clock, without shaking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

His mentor shook his hand and congratulated him with a laconic “Good game John, you fought well”.

John replied : “well, I knew about this opening, but I don’t know the details, I guess I’ll have to learn more theory here to play against someone as strong as you. After you pushed e5, it looked as if my game was in shambles ! And you kept surprising me with little unexpected moves… I just couldn’t find any way out… Where did I go wrong exactly ? I’m still not sure.”

His mentor replied : “Well John, I don’t know about the theory here, but when you build this pawn chain with e3-d4-c5, Black’s best reaction is always e5 : it frees my play and weakens your pawns. So you must find a way to prevent it. A good starting place would be to analyze the position after Bf6 and see if you could have fared better. But do it by yourself, I mean, if you plan on becoming a stronger player. We’ll review your analysis together next time. It looked like a pretty critical position, didn’t it ?”

“- Hmmm, I see. And did I make any other mistake?”

“- Well, when defending, I’m not quite sure you spent enough time at the right moments, and pushing those pawns in front of your king, I’m not sure it was the best defence : you see, they advance, they advance, but at some stage, I can hit them and your king is exposed. That’s something you may want to look at too.”

On his way back home, John started to feel better about his loss. He was very impressed by his mentor’s way of playing, but he felt like he had learnt something new, essential, about the game. His mentor’s explanations made clear sense to him, like he had already assimilated them. “Time to find how to prevent the e5 push in this variation” he thought…

Comments


  • 23 months ago

    magic-yak

    Ummmm is there an answer to the position after Bf6?? i can't find anything 16Qc3 doesn't work Bxf3 Bxf3 e5 and the bishop on f6 is just to strong...

    It would be really cool if 15 Qb7 would work

  • 23 months ago

    zmrle

    Bf6, Nxe4, Bxe4, Qc3, Bxf3, e5, Bg3 looks fine for white

  • 23 months ago

    Lucidish_Lux

    Well-written. The narrative was very accurate. 

  • 24 months ago

    XavierPadilla

    I liked it a lot, hicetnunc, thank you for sharing! Usually I'm too lazy to carefully read a chess article, but this one's point of view (plenty of doubts, like a real chess game) kept me going through the end. And great title, too!

  • 24 months ago

    HunteR542

    a WOW form of an article! awesome!

  • 24 months ago

    elbowgrease

    SmileSmileSmile

  • 24 months ago

    flamencowizard

    I like this style - very interesting.

  • 24 months ago

    eruroraito

    Perfect article featuring a storyline.

    Sure the article featured a lot of advices.

  • 24 months ago

    hicetnunc

    Hello Mimchi. I'm glad you enjoyed the article despite the language shortcomings. Unfortunately, I'm not a native speaker, but I'm eager to learn and improve, so you're welcome to point the mistakes and improvements as well Tongue out

    I'm a firm believer in the virtues of analyzing with a stronger player, whatever the game Smile

  • 24 months ago

    Mimchi

    The story is in some need of serious editing and grammatical changes, but well-intentioned and thoroughly enjoyable. The game was exciting too!

  • 24 months ago

    CraftiNine

    nice game and loved the narration of the game

  • 24 months ago

    fleiman

    It's one of the most interesting Articles that I've read ever.

  • 24 months ago

    hicetnunc

    Thank you for your positive feedback.

    I guess the story format is less appealing for strong players like Elubas who prefer to go to the heart of the matter quickly ! Smile

  • 24 months ago

    jayzetar

    Interestingly written

  • 24 months ago

    Lawdoginator

    I like the story format. Keep up the good work! 

  • 24 months ago

    JoseOchoa

    It looks that that e5 pawn brake is just the right strategy for black. I consider that kind of situations very hard to handle(being on the recieving side). Maybe white could have tried 17.Qa4 putting pressure on c6. If black takes on d4 White might retake with the knight. It's true that the knight ends pinned but I think white could get good counterplay in the c6 square. Anyway, I have played this opening a few times and was very nice to see a good game played on it, very instructive.

  • 24 months ago

    JohnGalt33

    nice

  • 24 months ago

    Elubas

    I didn't like this story format. Playing chess doesn't really make for an interesting story Tongue out, and naturally all the third person made it indirect and harder to get instructive value (though there still was plenty!). Perhaps white should have played a bit more dynamically, playing for Ne5 or e4 instead of allowing ...e5 with no fight. If black played ...Nxe5 dxe5 Ne4, maybe white could get away with moving his knight away and playing for f3.

  • 24 months ago

    studentofchess09

    really enjoyed this

  • 24 months ago

    cofail

    Good blog, interesting game too.

Back to Top

Post your reply: