Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Confessions of a Late Bloomer

The term "Late Bloomer" is used metaphorically to describe an adult who develops more slowly than others in their age group, but eventually catches up and in some cases overtakes their peers, or an adult whose talent (chess playing) or genius in a particular field only appears later in life than is normal but in some cases only in old age.

Truth be told, many of those who seriously altered the landscape of our lives were individuals who found their groove later in life. Many even started out delayed, only to end up successes beyond expectation. That was merely the first such experience that led me to realize that we live in a society with peculiar expectations about the time course of success. We think that if a child isn't blossoming as fast as the others in grade school, he or she will be hard-pressed to eventually flourish. When I was younger, I struggled all the time to catch up, but was fortunate to manage the correct path. It wasn't until later in life that I was able to make the right groves to success.

 Late bloomers are actually plentiful, and each has his or her own story and distinctive pathway. Stopping to look at all the paths together calls into question some of society's most cherished beliefs about the nature of human development, the roles of intelligence and education in creative achievement, and the ingredients of success at any age. All too often, what society thinks is a limiting factor has harsh early life experiences, such as parental loss might have turned out to be the very thing that enables eventual success.

Did you consider yourself to be a late bloomer like myself or were you very successful from the beginning? 

Comments


  • 4 years ago

    sbkaufman

  • 4 years ago

    missichess

    i like sdo advice

    it's not like anyone gets out of here alive... what's the rush? Laughing or worry?

    we're not guaranteed anything except this moment

    enjoy your life as time ticks away those moments

    the end will eventually arrive and whether you were a late or early bloomer won't matter

  • 4 years ago

    phyxius

    I'll call late bloomers "experimentalists" and the early bloomers "conceptualists."

    It may be that conceptualists have a very natural peak in their early years because of two factors: a learning peak and a neural peak. For conceptualists, concepts are grasped, mastered and built on quickly, but are explored in their learning. Once they absorb a subject, they get tenaciously attached to worthless novelty, they find new things, or they're just not able to think about things in the same creative way. That's what I mean by a learning peak.

    Second, to go further out on a limb, could there be a neural peak? There are many late-blooming artists, but how many late-blooming mathematicians? Not many. Since there's the epitome of conceptual work, there might be something natural to it. One suspects, let's say, spark of creativity in conceptualists may actually consume neural connections which cannot be regained.

    It's interesting to think of and compare some notables in these terms. It would be instructive to see examples of late-blooming non-experimentalists, for example. I also think that there are many fields where artists are encouraged to make the transition from one approach to another, such as the actor that becomes a director. Perhaps this subject encompasses much of the difficulty of the artist at mid-life.

  • 4 years ago

    sdo

    It's all relative.

    If your life is going to be short then you have to peak earlier than others.

    If your going to live long than you can peak later than others.

    It's not when you peak, it that you do, reach your ablities.

    It's your life, Live it at your pace.

Back to Top

Post your reply: