Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

They Improved Stratego! (Maybe)

  • qixel
  • | Jul 11, 2009 at 9:31 AM
  • | Posted in: Amy's Blog
  • | 2772 reads
  • | 7 comments

When I was a kid I loved Stratego.  I hate to admit this on a chess website, but I loved Stratego more than chess.  A lot more.

But when I got a little older I discovered how tedious Stratego was if you attempted to play it at all intelligently.

Over the years there have been various redesigns.  A thing called Ultimate Stratego wasn't bad.  Electronic Stratego was pretty good too.  Then, in the wake of the extreme success of Magic: The Gathering, they tried a collectible version called Stratego: Legends.  That one sucked for a number of reasons.  Then there were some themed versions, like Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.  I don't know about those...never tried them.

In 2008, Milton Bradley (now owned by the megalith Hasbro) produced a version called Stratego: Ice vs Fire.  If nothing else, this new version has some interesting pieces.  These include the Dragon, Mage, Sorceress, and Yeti (yeah, Yeti).  Not only is the Dragon the most powerful piece, it can also fly over any number of adjacent pieces and attack on the same turn.  The Mage can force your opponent to reveal a piece up to two squares away.  The Sorceress can require an opposing piece to join your army.  And the Yeti attacks all pieces in adjacent squares simultaneously.

One strategy you might try: Sneak a sorceress into your opponent's territory, enchant a dwarf to join your army, then attack your enemy's traps with it.

I've only played Stratego: Ice vs Fire a few times, but I thought it opened and speeded the game quite a bit.  I'm not sure the changes increased the tactical or strategic depth, but it at least gave me the incentive to revisit this old game from my childhood.

Comments


  • 4 years ago

    DeepGreene

    Qixel wrote:

    It always seemed that whoever made a fortress out of Australia would win.

    Now see, every darn time I've ever played Risk, the game always ends with the decided winner and the clear loser agreeing that the latter can keep Australia rather than bother to waste yet another hour achieving comprehensive genocide.

    Australia is where the second-best go to die.

    In Risk, I mean.  :-)

  • 4 years ago

    qixel

    DeepGreene wrote:

    The Generals.  It was like Stratego, except that you never showed your opponent your piece, even on the attack.  In a fight, you each took the relevant piece and put it into a slot (still facing away from your opponent) and an electronic judge would call who won.

     

    Electronic Stratego worked much the same way.  It had an electronic judge anyway.  It also had bombs that you could secretly place under some of your pieces.  And you could find out the relative strength of any opposing piece on the board in exchange for giving up your turn.

  • 4 years ago

    DeepGreene

    I bought that same version about a month or two ago and it's a good time.  It reminds me of a game I used to LOVE when I was younger:  The Generals.  It was like Stratego, except that you never showed your opponent your piece, even on the attack.  In a fight, you each took the relevant piece and put it into a slot (still facing away from your opponent) and an electronic judge would call who won.  It added a fun dimension because it sometimes took a little longer to figure out exactly what your opponent was using against you.

    Anyway, this is the only Stratego I've ever played, so I don't have much else for a frame of reference.  It's good fun anyway, and yeah, relatively quick.

  • 4 years ago

    qixel

    zankfrappa wrote:

    Battleship was great too and so was Risk.  The only thing I didn't like about RIsk was the roll of the dice introduced luck into the equation.

    My older brother used to force me to play Risk by making ugly threats against my Barbie collection.

    It always seemed that whoever made a fortress out of Australia would win.  Then I invented a counterstrategy that I called "Going nomad".  I would pick an out-of-the-way country in Asia, like Irkutsk, build up a giant army there, and bide my time until I could make a massive attack by sweeping out of the steppes.Smile

  • 4 years ago

    zankfrappa

         I loved Stratego.  Battleship was great too and so was Risk.  The only thing I didn't like about RIsk was the roll of the dice introduced luck into the equation.
          We also used to play a lot of Uno and another great card game called
    Mille Bornes.
           Clue was great as well, and another fun game was Masterpiece, in which you had to guess the value of famous paintings.
            We always seemed to lean toward Parker Brothers, although Milton Bradley
    had great games too.  I can't remember many Hasbro games.
            We were an Air Force family and moved quite a bit so we didn't always
    know people when we first moved somewhere, so we played a lot of board games.

  • 4 years ago

    ChessCarpenter

    I have always loved playing Stratego when I was younger!  I never kept up with all of the other variants of it though.  This new version sounds very good.

    Not to change the subject, but I used to play a game called "All the King's Men" has any one played it before or even heard of it?

    http://www.abstractstrategy.com/all-the-kings-men.html




  • 4 years ago

    batgirl

    I like Stratego too.  For a time I even played it online, in fact, though I can't remember the URL anymore.

Back to Top

Post your reply: