The Blindfold Simul Show w/GM Gareev and Host IM Rensch is LIVE on Chess.com/TV with IM Rensch - Open to ALL! Come and watch! Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

NimzoRoy Against Sämisch in Nimzo-Indian Defence

The Nimzo-Indian Defence (E20-E59) is a chess opening characterised by the moves: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4. This hypermodern opening was developed by Grandmaster Aron Nimzowitsch who introduced it to master-level chess in the early 20th century. Unlike most Indian openings the Nimzo-Indian does not involve an immediate fianchetto, although Black often follows up with ...b6 and ...Bb7. By pinning White's knight Black prevents the threatened 4.e4 and seeks to inflict doubled pawns on White. White will attempt to create a pawn centre and develop his pieces to prepare for an assault on the Black position.

Black's delay in committing to a pawn structure makes the Nimzo-Indian (sometimes colloquially referred to as the "Nimzo") a very flexible defence to 1.d4. It can also transpose into lines of the Queen's Gambit or Queen's Indian Defence. The Nimzo-Indian is a highly respected defence to 1.d4, is played at all levels and has been played by every world champion since Capablanca. White often plays 3.g3 or 3.Nf3 to avoid the Nimzo-Indian, allowing him to meet 3.Nf3 Bb4+ (the Bogo-Indian Defence) with 4.Bd2 or 4.Nbd2, rather than 4.Nc3.

Nimzoroy plays the Nimzo-Indian against my d4 in this game:

http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=53427026

I opted for the rarely played Sämisch Variation with move 4.a3. According to Wikipedia, this variation (named after Fritz Sämisch)  is a direct attempt to refute Black's strategic concept, as White gives up a tempo and concedes doubled c-pawns to gain the bishop pair. After 4...Bxc3+ 5.bxc3, Black has several possibilities, the most common of which is that he immediately begins to blockade the doubled pawns with 5....c5 and applies more pressure on the (often doomed) pawn at c4 with the moves ...Ba6, ...Nc6-a5 and ...Rc8. In the early days of this line, 5....d5 was frequently played, though it was soon realised that this enabled White to liquidate the weakness at c4, so the idea fell from favour, particularly after the game Botvinnik-Capablanca, AVRO 1938, and has never been revived at top level. As compensation, White establishes a powerful centre, in order to play for a kingside attack before Black can make use of his static advantages. White has two main options for playing: he can move slowly into the centre with 6.e3, or he can play 6.f3, followed by 7.e4 to take a quick hold in the centre. In practice, however, Black has demonstrated that White's structural weaknesses are more serious than the attacking chances he gets, so this variation is rarely seen nowadays. The Sämisch Variation was employed five times by Mikhail Botvinnik against Tal in the 1960 World Chess Championship, with five draws resulting, and once in the 1961 rematch, with a win for White.

We were following the book moves in this variation up to move 10. On move 11, I decided to deviate and played a dubious move 11.Nh3 instead of 11.Be3, then sacrificed two pawns, ignored the threat on my bishop and rook on a1 and sacrificed my knight with Nxf7. The game is shown below using NimzoRoy's favorite club set in the diagram:



SmileLaughing


 

Comments


  • 5 weeks ago

    sollevy10

    my hp mini 5103 is too slow for fritz or chessbase but i hope chess.com would soon retire the old chess wizard we are using and come up with a new chess gui with moves or variations and sub-variations that are easy to follow.

  • 5 weeks ago

    NimzoRoy

    Correct the game moves are in Black. As I now recall the best way to play thru games posted in the chess.com diagrams with lots of annotations is to save them to your own chess program for instance both Fritz and ChessBase have much bigger "panes" available for the board, the game score and annotations. AND they make the game moves very clear from the analysis and have options to "fold" and "unfold" excessive analysis anywhere or everywhere in the game. I'm sure most other chess programs and DBs also have these features as well.

  • 5 weeks ago

    sollevy10

    I'm actually seeing black for the main variation. I think the way the moves as well as variations and sub-variations are presented can still be improved. Right now, it is actually difficult to figure out how many variations and sub-variations are shown. Sometimes it is hard to tell as to which variation a  sub-variation is under. The color coding scheme is good but very limited as a method to categorize the moves. I also enjoy playing with you NimzoRoy. I always look forward on what you have to say in blogs as well as in our vote chess game moves.

  • 5 weeks ago

    NimzoRoy

    I wish chess.com would use green instead of blue for the main variations because there's very little contrast between the black game moves and blue main variations. I also wish I beat sollevy10 more often, but even my losses to him are better played than a lot of my wins.

  • 10 months ago

    sollevy10

    I'm sure chess.com can afford to get a better game analysis software because they are free. I think they can improve the analysis by putting limits on the number of games that a member can send for analysis. that is, if the reason for such quality is their limited computer strength. btw, here is the complete chess.com game analysis:

  • 10 months ago

    NimzoRoy

    The analysis here is by the chess.com PC, which is often mediocre: "it" seems to be very hung up on "mistakes" "errors" and "blunders" in positions where the loser is already a Rook down or more, and I'm NOT exaggerating. You'd think they could afford a decent analysis program at least for premium members, but it's better than nothing and some of it overlaps my own often mediocre analysis



  • 11 months ago

    Loufoque

    Now i've remember of this play. The blunders, it's me and two move, and others players.....

  • 11 months ago

    sollevy10

    Thanks tobolskwildnet. This game against NimzoRoy reminds me of our TVC game against our friends in the Bogolyubov group. They were winning overwhelmingly after we gave up all our queenside, then our attack was unstoppable and they were about to resign. however we still lost after we blundered our last three moves. here's your song in French (which sounds like Spanish).Smile

  • 11 months ago

    Loufoque

    Bravo Sol. In fact i study a lot. Of. play beetween Bogolioubov against Alhekine. Bogolioubov. Used. a 3 two time and it's positif .... But Alekhine used at 6• move an exchange. Variante and win. a play ! So. you are right other. Possibilty. Are possible . Thanks again. Regards .... PS. World champion. 1929.

Back to Top

Post your reply: