18096 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Some people say saying check is not needed in a proper game. That is half true, because your opponent should be paying attention to the game and know that herself or himself is in check, but with new players, saying check is a vital thing. People also get distracted in their games, or do not focus (read my last article, 'Focus is the key' ) and they do not realize they are in check. Here is something to argue about!
djrojas, I agree that saying check during a tournament would be rude and silly.
In over the board tournament play saying check is rude. You are implying something your oponent is already well aware of. If he is not aware and makes an illegal move then you might just get more time on your clock!
Interrobang, what you wrote, " I say let them waste a little time now and then. They will learn faster to pay more attention to the possible threats in their opponents' moves that way." makes a lot of sense. Nothing is more disturbing to a beginner than being told, "You can't move there because you are in check." Or just saying, "You cannot move there." They would no doubt remember that much more than just saying, "CHECK!" But sometimes it is just fun to do.
Since by rule the king can never leave the board (in a "proper game"), and any move that fails to address the check is illegal and cannot be played, verbally notifying the opponent of check serves as nothing more than a courtesy in case they would otherwise not notice and spend time thinking about other lines. This almost never happens among competent players who are accustomed to giving consideration to their kings' safety. But it happens to beginning players on occasion. I say let them waste a little time now and then. They will learn faster to pay more attention to the possible threats in their opponents' moves that way.
Once in a while I am right. It makes up for all of the times I am wrong, well, at least it helps.
Your all right!
UVFO2368, the king in never captured. The king never leaves the board. The king must move, the check blocked or the checking piece captured, but never is the king captured.
Saying check has both a wonderful sound and a threatening sound. Why not say it? It can, in some cases, be very demoralizing to an opponent, especially when the opponent is not aware of the check and the danger the king is in.
I have played some opponents that insist that one should say, "Queen check" when the queen is in danger. I refuse to do that. If my opponent is not aware of the queen's possible capture, tough luck. She's mine to capture!
I was taught not to say check. If they don't notice and make an illegal move leaving their king in check, capture it! GAME OVER!
View complete profile
Fair chess rules? part2
by zingrat 4 years ago
Fair chess rules?
News!!!!!! plz read!
Different rules...the challange
Bishop or Knight?
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!