Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Gambit

  • Last updated on Thu, 9/9/2010 4:50am.

  • Send to friend
  • | 167 reads
  • | 13 comments

A wrestling term for tripping up the heels.  It is derived from the Italian gamba (leg) and gambitare (set traps).  Ruy Lopez was the first to use it as a chess term for traps in his book in 1561 to describe the Damiano Gambit, 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5.  Ruy Lopez learned the term from a visit to Rome, who used it as a slang term.  Greco introduced the term into England and France in 1623 (Joachimo’s Gambettos).

A gambit is a chess opening in which a piece (usually a pawn) is sacrificed in order to achieve an advantage.

There are three general methods in which a gambit can help a player's position. For a gambit to be sound it will typically have some degree of at least two of the following:

  • Gain of Time: the player accepting the gambit must take time to procure the sacrificed material and possibly must use more time to reorganize his pieces after the material is taken.
  • Generation of differential activity: Often a player accepting a gambit will decentralize his pieces or pawns and his poorly placed pieces will allow the gambiteer to place his own pieces and pawns on squares that may otherwise have been inaccessible. In addition, bishops and rooks can become more active simply because the loss of pawns often gives rise to open files and diagonals. Former world champion Mikhail Tal, one of the most extraordinary attacking players of the 20th century, once said that he had sacrificed a pawn just because "it was in his way."
  • Generation of positional weaknesses: Finally, accepting a gambit may lead to a compromised pawn structure, holes or other positional deficiencies.

Comments


  • 5 years ago · Quote · #1

    gavin

    I'm all about sacrificing pawns 'cause they're in my way
  • 5 years ago · Quote · #2

    Skillz88

    its not as easy as it looks!!

    if u sacrifice then u SHOULD have a definite disadvantage in the endgame but becuase u develop faster... u might gain the pawn back... hopefully Wink


  • 5 years ago · Quote · #3

    PawnFork

    If you last into the endgame, making up the pawn may be easy--depends on the rating of the opponent.  Focus on active piece play.
  • 5 years ago · Quote · #4

    nicfer07

    Mikhail Tal is a genius he is my idol.
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #5

    illuminosferatu


    I often use gambits.  Even if people don't accept them, the gambit itself then becomes part of an attack if I choose to take advantage of it.  c4 pawn is my favorite gambit.
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #6

    srn347

    The advantage in the opening formed form a gambit is typically enough to regain it and still have a positional or otherwise advantage. If not regained by the midgame or endgame, however, the gamit will have backfired. I learned that the hard way while trying the icelandic gambit.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #7

    Goppew

    used to be my favorite, now it's the colle zukertort

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #8

    Nightcastledup

    Ahh, So what if you can gambit on move #2 lets see if you can gambit on 10 or 20 moves in or somewhere like that!!!

  • 21 months ago · Quote · #9

    Aidyl

    nice

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #10

    luxlucisvia

    Really? closing the chat box after losing? Are you afraid of a gg?

  • 17 months ago · Quote · #11

    Dondon7

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 13 months ago · Quote · #12

    Dondon7

    [COMMENT DELETED]
Back to Top

Post your reply: