7600 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
IamHutterite
I have mixed feelings of this one, folks. Chessbase.com is quoted of saying that "Topalov will not be accepting or offering draws" during the match next month.
Does this guarentee us an exciting match, or has someone gone over the top again?
I should point out where I got this information from, sorry 'bout that... Check it out on chessbase.com: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=6183
goldendog
I'd say it was indeed a non-event psychologically for the players. Neither player could claim anything like "I'm going to be a tiger this match" or "No draws" or "I'm out for blood" and expect the other player to make changes or be fearful.
They're both so good and so experienced.
rubygabbi
devoid said:
Sounds like some pretty weak pre match psychology too maybe. Anand won't be even remotely intimidated though. Possibly it's just a tactic to drum up a little further interest in the match amongst the chess community.
Either that, or he has a fine sense of humor. If the match needs any hyping, They should bring in Muhammed Ali, or use a medium to get advice from Bobby.
paul211
This claim is made by Danailov and refers to the Sofia rule and I quote:"
"The players should not offer draws directly to their opponents. Draw-offers will be allowed only through the Chief-Arbiter in three cases: a triple-repetition of the position, a perpetual check and in theoretically drawn positions."
Sofia rule directly eliminates the possibility for fast (less than 15 moves draws), and seems to bring exciting games for the audience at large.
As long as every win is encouraged by financial incentive, where the players receive parts of the prize fund not according to their final standing, but according to the number of games won it could bring more interesting games.
Statistically I think this approach should bring down the number of draws by reducing the strive for draws with blacks.
However this approach does not prevent in my opinion a draw in the end game where the action can be most exciting, by repetition of moves etc.
Just an opinion.
Or it could be that... Topalov is going after the title in a very aggressive way. Although I was taken back a bit, I wasn't too suprised since it came from Topalov himself. In my opinion, I don't think anyone else would come up with something like that. Topalov isn't my favorite sport of all time, but he might be onto something good here.
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by chessolite a few minutes ago
French Help
by pfren a few minutes ago
Easiest opening to learn for beginners ..
by AdvLegitimate 3 minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by chessblood 4 minutes ago
Why Isn't Carlsen the World Champion?
by jetfighter13 11 minutes ago
what is your worst loss
by finalunpurez 16 minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by jetfighter13 19 minutes ago
New Site Design Feedback
by bulletheadbilly 22 minutes ago
Chessboard Magic 2 - solution
by rafbf2 26 minutes ago
♥ Pawn In Love with a Dark Queen ♥
by nollaig55 30 minutes ago