6358 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
ravster
Hey Chess.com!
I was wondering that in late june, i am planning to buy myself my 1st chess engine. After looking around, it seems like Fritz 12 is the way to go but i just wanted confirmation that this is the right engine for a player like me? I am really looking for an engine that can store all my games in a database, can show my mistakes in these games and possibly suggest how they were errors (as well as a 'correct' variation). is it also wise to go for Deep Fritz, or just the normal ones?
Thanks for any comments,Ravi
trigs
rybka 4 is out (or coming out very soon) and is allegedly the strongest engine out there.
yeah ive heard of rybka 4, but i dont know if the strongest engine is necessarily the best if you know what i mean
Ravi
gimce
Almost any engine is good enough if you wish to play or analyze your games for tactics.
If you are a very very tough player, you should look at the best. Otherwise, I seem to prefer either Fritz or Chessmaster; the personalities in chessmaster are what keeps a feel of a tournament for me and push to improve.
the game collection in chessmaster is also more than sufficient for most people.
What I feel is the greatest advantage of Fritz is that ALL(ok ok, most) internet downloads (games, databases etc) come in Fritz format.
and do u recommend the deep version or the normal one?
philidor_position
If you're looking only for an engine and happy with the free Arena interface, there's no need to waste 100$ when you already have such strong free alternatives like Firebird, Ivanhoe and Stockfish.
If you're looking for a commercial easy to use interface, than that's different.
ok so what is the difference between these engines to others like Rybka or fritz?
They are all much stronger than Fritz. Firebird and Ivanhoe are about the same strength as Rybka 4 and slightly stronger than Stockfish, which is expected to be the strongest engine with its major next release.
Oh, and Rybka is 90$ while these are free and open source (except firebird, which is free but not open source).
interesting, but then there must be a reason why one costs more than the other?
Sorry for the questions i just want to be sure lol
Well, one (Rybka) steals code from open source engines like Fruit and makes collaborations with commercial giants like Chessbase and Convekta, securing a lot of promotion and marketing to make money out of that, while others just as good, choose to share their work for free and openly. Not a rare occurance in the digital world under capitalist conditions.
Captainbob767
I always wonder how good a player has to be to be able to tell the difference between the "best" engine and one a few points lower? Something I'll never have to worry about........
thats interesting, so there isnt any difference, except some try to get profit
ill look into it then
brfc
i feel fritz 12 is the best computer for storing databases and also showing you mistakes from analysis. If it's endgames you're looking for, fritz isn't at its strongest and for the first few moves it will tell you entirely the wrong opening moves unless you put an opening book in it! I don't know much about deep fritz, so can't help ya with that. I find the normal fritz just as good. Rybka is strongest out there, and its endgame analysis is superb. With Fritz 12 you get a year free with playchess.com, a live chess thing which comes with fritz, or you can download an application from playchess.com and then pay for membership for another year (thirty euros i think) So I'd reccomend fritz 12 to you for the whole package of analysis (and hilarious stupid comments at times!!) and also for it's ability to give you the advantage/disadvantage of a certain position
thanks brfc for that. out of interest, what stupid comments?
And how would you implant an opening book?
RainbowRising
Rybka 4 > all
Skwerly
yes, you cannot go wrong with fritz. it has a HUGE aftermarket support (videos, databases, engines, etc) and won't let you down.
when it comes down to it, analyzing a game with a 3000 rated engine vs a 3200 rated engine really doesnt' make that much difference to us players. :)
Kotomitsuki
You can use Fritz (any number) as GUI (Graphical User Interface) and use one of these strung and free chessengines with it. The strength of the engines is tested in gigantic engine tournaments. No human plays that good.
bigpoison
I always thought the Buick 3800 was a great engine. Alas, it has been discontinued. You can't go wrong with a straight six, though.
nimzovich
I'd recommend checking some of the demonstrations on youtube of engines/interfaces to get a potential feel for what you are comfortable and what features are important to you.
musicalhair
did that come with the GUI by Fischer?
Smith-Morra defence
by ghostofmaroczy a few minutes ago
5/25/2012 - Reshevsky-Ivanovic, Skopje 1976
by zero0cripton a few minutes ago
New Site Design Feedback
by DrSpudnik 2 minutes ago
How does chess.com ratings compare with FIDE ratings?
by vischtxy 6 minutes ago
Easiest opening to learn for beginners ..
by 1pawndown 9 minutes ago
A fast game in a slow night.
by batgirl 12 minutes ago
got a clock that can do this?
by TyrannusVerticalis 12 minutes ago
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by ClavierCavalier 13 minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by TonyH 15 minutes ago
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by malko 17 minutes ago