Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

chess.com Tactics Trainer - The Woodpecker Method


  • 6 months ago · Quote · #82

    Fer8799

    Hi, can anyone share the books that is using for training with the woodpecker method?

    It is not clear for me if it is better to train with "simple" problems (e.g. 3 moves themes/combinations) in other to solve a lot of them or more complex, than could take 10 minutes or more.

    Thanks!

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #83

    petrip

    According the book simple ones.  Probabaly almost any tactis puzzle book will do

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #84

    Fer8799

    Thanks for your answer petrip!!

    Yep, this is what I also read in the book, but when you see the exercices included in this chapter, they don't look so "easy" as a "mate in three". This is my doubt, he says everthing is fine, but exercices in the book have medium difficulty.

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #85

    antonreiser

    Fer

     

    todo depende un poco de tu nivel; en mi caso, cuando empecé con esto perdí mucho tiempo forzándome a hacer ejercicios bastante complejos para mi nivel; mi consejo es hacer muchísimos ejercicios de táctica simples. para eso la palicación chessimo es excelente, aunque de pago. otra opción es hacer táctica aquí ajustano el rating a niveles bajos, aunque creo que nos epuede repetir.

    una vez que estuve unos meses haciendo chessimo e hice unos 10.000 ejericios, empecé a ver muchas cosas que antes no veía enel tablero.

    Los ejercicios del libro de A Smith efectivamente son complejos.

    otra buen aopción es el libro tactics time, con 1000 ejericios simples para repetir hasta que los puedas hacer cada uno enunos pocos segundos, que es la misma idea que utiliza chessimo.

     

    Si tienes un nivel alto, pues olvida todo esto, claro...

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #86

    Fer8799

    Gracias antón!

    Supongo que todo pasa por hacer algo de esfuerzo pero no "bloquearte" en cada ejercicio. 

    A que llamas nivel bajo/alto, que elo tienes?

  • 4 weeks ago · Quote · #87

    SilentKnighte5

    ElKitch wrote:

    I dont undestand.. the graph show a ~450 leap from jan 2006-2008. Why is that an improvement of 35 rating points in 10yr time?

    Because some people like to argue, math be damned.

  • 4 weeks ago · Quote · #88

    SilentKnighte5

    Carlsen has only improved by 50 points a year since 2001. Not sure why everyone makes such a big deal about that guy.

  • 4 weeks ago · Quote · #89

    isauro2013

    SilentKnighte5 wrote:

    Carlsen has only improved by 50 points a year since 2001. Not sure why everyone makes such a big deal about that guy.

    Maybe because Carlsen doesn't have a publisher promising that if you buy his book, you will reach 2800. False advertisement is not a good way to endorse a book.

  • 4 weeks ago · Quote · #90

    SilentKnighte5

    Reading comprehension is oh so difficult.


Back to Top

Post your reply: