10555 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The better question is who is better: Muller or Dvoretsky?
You could even add in Nunn. He is a strong English grandmaster who published a two volume series on endgames. He also has his own opening encyclopedia.
Nunn for beginners (Understanding Chess Endgames, otherwise his two volume set is quite good), Muller for intermediates, and Dvoretsky for class B and above.
Shereshevsky (Endgame Strategy).
By far the best, since it's as far from a typical endgame book as it gets.
I noticed in Dvoretsky's "From the author" section of the Endgame Manual, he mentions that he prepared a series of lectures on the general principles of endgame play for the Moscow High School for Sports. He then goes on to say, that the main ideas of that series became (with his permission) the basis of the book Endgame Strategy by Shereshevsky. If he is the originator of that content, that is just one more reason why Dvoretsky is the greatest endgame author of all time.
Regarding the general question of Dvoretsky v. Silman, the question is somewhat ridiculous in my view, since the Silman book is so much less complex and dense. Silman provides easily understandable and very wordy presentations of a realtively small number of important endgame positions, and is one of many beginner endgame books that could be read prior to the Endgame Manual. Silman, or the equivalent thereof, would be a prerequisite to Dvoretsky.
6/29/2015 - Mate in 2
by manishghop a few minutes ago
Best excuse for losing
by Little-Charles a few minutes ago
Grandmaster's queen cannot checkmate. What he does next is GENIUS!
by chocfang 5 minutes ago
by chocfang 6 minutes ago
Chess.com users should be REQUIRED to use REAL NAMES.
by RonaldJosephCote 8 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by ijgeoffrey 10 minutes ago
blitz/bullet rating is the only thing that matters in internet chess
by najdorf96 11 minutes ago
What if no one plays chess on your area?
by tkbunny 13 minutes ago
by RCMorea 14 minutes ago
How long have you been a member of Chess.com?
by tkbunny 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!