6269 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Frenchie501
As the question says above, how outdated is this book?
I'm trying to study the Berlin Defence, and it only shows 6 variations (with of course 24 sub variations or different ideas). However it shows none of the Kasparov/Kramnik Berlin games which is a worry considering Kramnik is probably responsible for it being played again (from what others have said to me).
Are there any new lines to consider, or any of the lines in this book that are now considered dubious due to further analysis?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
drd
That's an interesting question, and I see he also did the last MCO, as well as a more recent (2003) opening book.
The original Batsford was Kaspy et al. correct?
Jpatrick
Modern Chess Openings was never intended to be a definitive work on openings, but rather a guide to demonstrate the main ideas and some of the more popular (at the time) lines.
The best way to study a specific line in depth is to get all the games you can with that line organize them with a chess database utility. Lacking that, a big opening book for a chess engine (which should be revisable) will surely get you to a good level.
But seriously, if the Berlin defense appeals to you, then play it, and don't worry too much about the "book". The experience you gain from your own games plus the study of other games of strong players will give you a feel for what will happen in the middle games. This experience will guide you toward finding good moves once you are out of book.
Webhead
Take MCO-14 for what it is. It's not up to the minute, but you can rely on it for the most part. If you want info on a specific opening, line, or variation then you should get books or media specific to that. Also, unless you are playing at the GM level, don't worry to much about having yesterday's newest theory on an opening. The guy on the other side of the board won't have it either.
Niven42
I use MCO-13, so I guess I'm hopelessly out of date...
Really, studying openings is good for a while, and it will certainly help you from falling into opening traps, and being down material early, but after a while, you'll have a feel for what is the best thing to play, and not worry too much about it. Most openings have over 500 years of theory behind them and don't change very much from year-to-year.
This being the Internet age, the only way you can be sure to have the "latest and greatest" is to keep up with forum posts and reading articles on all the online sites.
JVC59
Thank you very much Niven42, I have 49 years and I played chess many time, I like it very much. With bad chance, I can't the time to read theory of play; I am play and I have many work, and investigation. Thank you again.
Excuse me Niven42. I am Physician.
Win a Bishop
by chessgeek100 2 minutes ago
My game against GM Michael Adams
by blake78613 7 minutes ago
Smith-Morra defence
by AdvLegitimate 9 minutes ago
New Site Design Feedback
by HessianWarrior 10 minutes ago
5/25/2012 - Reshevsky-Ivanovic, Skopje 1976
by zero0cripton 14 minutes ago
How does chess.com ratings compare with FIDE ratings?
by vischtxy 18 minutes ago
Easiest opening to learn for beginners ..
by 1pawndown 22 minutes ago
A fast game in a slow night.
by batgirl 24 minutes ago
got a clock that can do this?
by TyrannusVerticalis 24 minutes ago
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by ClavierCavalier 26 minutes ago