15358 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Roman Dzindzichasvili, a great teacher and author in his own right, says that Nimzo's book is slightly over the head of the average player. Since I have never studied the book, i can't have an opinion on this matter but I am guessing the book may be more useful to 2000 players and above.
Any opinion on this? Or is Roman just trying to market his own books and videos?
It was written for Masters. Dzindi is being kind coy and diplomatic.
Paul Gottlieb: I agree with him as far as the information in it has been accepted by Chess writer and master and are in their books.
About "MY SYSTEM" it was written in 1930. Eighty three years ago and of course it's a translation into English in didactic style of dry humor.
I said two days ago that I would give it a shot, and I have. Well I tried to read it and play it but It just didn't apeal to me. I then scanned the book to cover other sections and I see that I have read them in other books, because they have been accepted by chess writers and masters.
I think My System is not worth the trouble of reading it in descriptive notation.
I decided that I would use "Silman's Complete End Game Course."
Lev Albert's chess Course of four books and a new one I got.
Yes, it's a classic.
anytime somebody tells you a book (or movie) is a "Classic," that means it's something you probably would never be interested in otherwise.
Same goes with if a certain dish is a "Delicacy." Usually means it's something they know you wouldn't eat, if you knew exactly what it was.
cual es la gracia
El libro............muy bien.
Amazing book. A+++
On the subject : i would go for Watson. Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy: Advances since Nimzowitsch, Gambit Publications, 1999, ISBN 1-901983-07-2
I agree, Watson's book is also first class. I'm reading it at the moment.
Never read it, and don't care to read it anytime soon (also if they send me a free copy). Chess Books are totally useless.
It was one of the fist books I ever purchased. It is very good and a fun read.
Tal's forward to My System is in and of itself priceless! I read part of it in a biography of Petrosian by Shekhtman. Tal wasn't only a great world champion (he didn't hold the title long enough to be a great world champion), he was also one of the best chess commentators of all time!
For once I'm speechless...
I have more touble with chess books too. I learn SO much more in an hour of personalized live instuction or even from a video than I do from a book. Perhaps it my Messed-Up-A.D.D.-Instant-Gratification-Generation issues at play, but I improve more from alternative methods of instruction. I think it has something to do with the fact that I am an extremely visually-focused learner. Show me and I won't forget it (and will understand it faster).
I fully admit that I am a lower-level player too, so perhaps to a much higher-rated player a book, crammed with info is still the most "bang for your buck"?
I do understand that people learn differently from different sources, but the great advantage of a book over a video is that far more information can be crammed into a chess book than a video. Seeing a chessboard on a video does not impart extra information.
I have read that people feel they learn more from videos, but usually retain more in tests and quizzes if they read the material.
I watch videos for the sole purpose of entertainment. For education I prefer books (paper or electronic). I'm not a fan of chess videos. Learning is I find too slow. I can learn more reading in 30 minutes than watching a 1 hour video.
Only if you don't know how to read.
"Never read it, and don't care to read it anytime soon (also if they send me a free copy). Chess Books are totally useless."
Maybe that's why you are stuck at sub-1600. How long have u been playing. Looks like a long time, and u r still stuck @ sub-1600... LOL. I am 13yrs now, 1470 OTB, granted I am no Bobby Fischer, but I bet u in 5yrs time i will not be sub-1600 like you! Books are not "completely useless".
Thank u very much.
Took a verbal whuppin from a kid.....better yet a soon to be player that will be superior to you on the board in every way. lol.
i dont understand this GM's thought process...
by mattyf9 2 minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by AnishBhargava 5 minutes ago
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by BasterdSonOfTal 5 minutes ago
How good do you have to be to play the Sicilian
by SilentKnighte5 5 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by SmyslovFan 6 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by Till_98 7 minutes ago
Is being self taught good or bad?
by Mersaphe 8 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by ielosubmarine 28 minutes ago
PHOTOS and VIDEOS
by craftysusie 32 minutes ago
Don't checkmate the King
by Akatsuki64 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!