Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Pawn Powe in Chess


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #1

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #2

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #3

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #4

    meanpc

    I'm almost certain this book is not in the public domain.  Maybe in some countries it is?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #5

    qixel

    Before you get all excited about Pawn Power in Chess, did you check out in detail the preview on Google Books?

    It's a pretty strange book, idiosyncratic to say the least, and there may be better ones out there to help you with pawn play.

    So you might also look for Soltis's Pawn Structure Chess and Marovic's Understanding Pawn Play in Chess and Dynamic Pawn Play in Chess.  All three of these are more modern treatments of the subject.

    Amy

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #6

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #7

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #8

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #9

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #10

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #11

    dschaef2

    I would also recommend the soltis book, altough the notation takes a little getting used to.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #12

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #13

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #14

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #15

    Dragec

    oh, these Croatians can really make people happy

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #16

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #17

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #18

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #19

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 4 years ago · Quote · #20

    shahirildi

    [COMMENT DELETED]

Back to Top

Post your reply: