15628 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think 12 people every year buy "Think Like a Grandmaster". Now thanks to this thread it will be down to 1.
So sad that this thread came to late for me.
You got no benefit from it at all?
I guess that I was too weak at that point to understand most of the positions in the book.
I was just starting to play and I only had 5 books:
- a beginners book by an spanish author (Ricardo Aguilera)
- An opening book by Ludek Pachman
- Chess Master vs Chess Amateur by Euwe
- Winning with the Scandinavian by Shaun Taulbut
- Think like a Grand Master by Kotov
As you can see, I didn´t have nothing really useful for somebody that is just learning the basics.
The exercises in Kotov's book are so good that even if he got the evaluations wrong, it is possible, using the techniques he recommended, to find the right continuations and evaluations. That's pretty high praise when you think about it.
Every book, especially in the pre-computer era, has errors. Some of Kotov's analysis beats even today's engines. His books have been pilloried for decades, but they have also been used and studied by players who became masters, IMs, and even GMs.
I have a book called "Play Chess" where the two authors play against each other and one of them blunders mate in 1.
They also say that e4 is always better than d4
I agree with this, but I don't lump the three books in his series (Think, Play and Train) together. For me, Play is outstanding and I read/refer to it even today. Think is, to me, an overrated pseudo-classic. And Train I have simply never read.
"Play" is great. His other two books can be dispensed with, clearly.
What could I of done better (1100 10 min)
by SilentKnighte5 2 minutes ago
Looking for Defensive Tactics Resources....
by SilentKnighte5 4 minutes ago
Post You're Chess Sets
by Jack_Burton 6 minutes ago
Only a 40 year break...
by kayak21 12 minutes ago
Position in the Dragon Sicilian
by Douginator 21 minutes ago
a query about kga
by pfren 23 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by johnmusacha 26 minutes ago
by xntric30 33 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by Jameswalton101 36 minutes ago
How to analysis game on chromebook
by notmtwain 57 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!