8568 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
arthurdavidbert
I would like to see % of lessons attempted by resulting %.
rabbit611
BorgQueen
Ngf7 is mate... there is no need for the queen sac.
phaed
That's what I was thinking.
So, the main topic though... why do you feel that the current stats aren't good enough?
It already shows you the % of CM things attempted... and gives you a breakdown of percentages of your work.
Alexitooo
[COMMENT DELETED]
I said sac was no necessary but it is :S
YEAH good mate with 2 pretty Knights! _D
Huh?
I would like to see what % the number of each percentage group is of the whole.
Hmmm... ok, I don't see what the advantage of such statistics would be, but fair enough.
It would show whether I was getting better or worse in each area.
I guess if it had a history record of thos stats, you could chart it and see a trend.
yeah... yeah...
5/25/2012 - Reshevsky-Ivanovic, Skopje 1976
by 3943rjfrolland a few minutes ago
Trouble developing the b file knight Italian game
by TonyH a few minutes ago
Wht Bobby Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
by chrisr2212 6 minutes ago
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
by whatupyodog2 6 minutes ago
an endgame study
by Bubatz 6 minutes ago
My artistic mate
by LORD_KENNETH_____n_n 7 minutes ago
Database?
by NachtWulf 10 minutes ago
The Price of a Pawn
by Here_Is_Plenty 13 minutes ago
Why do we have chess?
by reflectivist 22 minutes ago
Timer
by dyado72 24 minutes ago