10433 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Betul juga la kamu cakap
I'm just learning so what are the big differences between the Pirc and the KID. To my amature eye, at the end of 5 moves both end up in this position. Whites side may be different but to me they play very similarly. Not trying to troll, just understand the differences.
Attempts at a different move order, will begin to elicit different responses that, end up forcing the position away from the one you hoped to transpose to, especially as the skill of those you play increase. They will know better how to punish you for innacurate play.
What I believe now would be:
For Adults who wants to play reasonable game in short,
1.d4 is better try. Some of my friends, after I briefly cover some opening principles like development, space, center control,...
Reinvented the London system and give me a difficult game. What's heartbreaking is I need to design a queen trap to e q u a l i z e my game after a mistake, and still a difficult game for me to holds the queen against night , pawn , rook. Perhaps he is a bright beginner with experiance in other chess-form games.
Yet after he tried 1.e4 , without knowing any exact lines, you imagine...
I would say 1.e4 you need more study of early moves, say the correct path to the 5-7 move tybiya, with serous amount of tactical justification or "positional tactics". For 1.d4, the error margin is larger (Visually poor moves are often in fact nice sidelines or even strong system played in weird move order), and allows player to seeks and realize his own goal in more original way.
I should add that 1.e4 e5 contain nice and easy-to-find material for tactics and quick positional disaster and worthy to study. Yet, studying it and clinging to it are different things!
Lastly I would illustrate the danger of playing 1.e4 e5 without accquinted to the early lines : 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.0-0
With the queens still on the board, can one without previous knowledge really play 5...f6, the taboo pawn push, without any doubt?
Hope this gives an alternative view to the discussion. Thanks.
How to simply stop all ads without paying!
by Snookslayer a few minutes ago
Transposition from Sicilian to English opening?
by hijodeluna 4 minutes ago
Post with a Tempo
by PRILSTONE 5 minutes ago
7/29/2014 - Full House
by JTV 11 minutes ago
Who is more physically attractive
by tkbunny 14 minutes ago
let's start banning people who abandon games
by tkbunny 18 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by Sports_Suck_2014 21 minutes ago
Russians at Chess.com
by Depthless_Lala 24 minutes ago
by chasm1995 28 minutes ago
I'm Amazed at Some People's Hatred of Descriptive Notation
by FooYee 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!