13838 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Yeah, you wouldn't.
Yes, I would. Your play is average at best.
Worse than average. But yours is too, as highly as you think of yourself.
Technically, Scott's play is considered above average, while Yereslov's is considered about average according to Chess.com's statistics.
1.d4 is better!!!
Both of you don't stand a chance against me today. This is one of my "good" days where I play at the level of an IM.
OK dude, have fun with that.
I am. How about a game?
Sure, send me an online game.
Actually just seen your rating, bit of a waste of my time.
Seriously, if you are considering a career in comedy, or think using subtle cheating tactics will work for you, I understand, but you aren't going to sucker me with that...
If I used engines, I would have never lost to Conquistador.
Just because you haven't in the past doesn't prevent you from doing so to someone...
And just because you haven't murdered anyone today doesn't mean that you won't murder someone tommorow.
How does that tie in with our original topic ?
It's sarcasm. The whole argument about what can and what can't happen is absurd.
One would think, based on your statement, that you are confused, considering you started the hypothetical talk about Tal's play...
All that fascinating rot aside, as black, I'll tell you that I tend to have the most fun against e4.
I've always found 1. e4 offered a better game as white. It gets the KB out quickly which facilitates castling, and while it invites the Sicilian, I'd rather face that defense than the Kings Indian or Grunfeld. But it's mostly a matter of taste.
Nameno, what I stated is a fact. Most of his sacrifices are refuted by modern chess theory and analysis.
Don't you ever let anything just go, Yereslov? Always one more go at saying some inane point again instead of clamming up and slinking offstage.
If Capablanca played Carlsen for the world champion match, who would win?
by DarkVlader a few minutes ago
by Diakonia a few minutes ago
by DamonevicSmithlov a few minutes ago
Looking for active play with black
by Elubas 5 minutes ago
WHY DO YOU PLAY CHESS ?
by marcomarco13 7 minutes ago
Your analysis chess set
by szociofoto 13 minutes ago
What to learn as black if I am going to play 1...e5?
by ruben72d 15 minutes ago
Best way to learn openings. . suggestions please
by PossibleOatmeal 20 minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by m0ve 28 minutes ago
The paradox of perfect chess
by bb_gum234 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!