11684 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm considereing plaing 1.a3 because I'm finding that I enjoy my openings that I use with Black, but don't enjoy openings as White. I'm considering playing 1.a3 so that if Black plays 1...e5, then I can play the Reversed French Defense with 2.e3 (that's my favorite response, very few people at the club level know how to play against the French properly), and if I...d5, then I can play my Reversed Benko Gambit with 2.Nf3.
Does this sound like a bad idea or a good idea.
White against 1...e5:
White against 1...d5:
Not a bad idea, if you feel more comfortable with your black openings than with the white ones.
But it would be better to have a good arsenal of white openings, because with 1.a3 you gave away the advantage of doing the first move.
When I've experimented with 1.a3 much of the time my opponent will make an equally obnoxious move like 1... h3. I never get into the reversed openings I was hoping for. I like the concept, but in practice it never seems to work how I want.
1. a3 a6 2. h3 h6 3. White resigns!
Why should Black response with 1...h6?
Maybe someone is doing this, but most players respond with e5,d5,c5 or maybe Nf6 or Nc6, but not h6!
They shouldn't play 1. ..h6, but that's the kind of garbage that happens to me when I play 1. a3.
So what I'm asking is that is it a good idea, or is it dubious and not a good idea?
It's all fine, but most players are much stronger with white and tries to draw when black, you're kinda giving them the chance to equalise early.
But it's playable. A passing move + making sure that bishop doesn't pin your knight. Many lines involve such moves, anyway.
While 1.a3 is pretty certainly better than 95% of the crappy gambits some white players are employing, you'd better try something more ambitious.
I have tried to make sense of what the first move of white should be.
I arrived at the conclusion that objectively apart from e4 and d4 no other move make sense. There is nothing that the other moves achieve which can't be achieved by e4 or d4 but they have drawbacks compared to e4 and d4.
I think the only decision you have to make is whether to play e4 (open game) or d4 (closed game) on the first move.
What's wrong with 1.a3?
Thats bad luck for you, but it happens :-)
I would then continue to play "normal" moves...when 1...h6 doesnt make any sense.
The move a3 simply gives black a chance to develop at will. Pressure on black is released. The fact that black can't any longer put a bishop on b4 is not enough compensation for this since there are several other good ways for black to develop.
My favourite example is c4. What does c4 achieve? It allows the b-knight to be developed behind a pawn. Good! But it also allows black to play e5 right away without the difficulties apparent in Ruy Lopez or the Italian game for example. Which side is better off here? I think clearly black.
What is wrong with playing the white pieces as black. That is what a3 does. It basically makes white, black. What is wrong with that? I like pkaying black more. I have a better repertoire like the french and the benko. I do not see anything wrong with playing white as black. Even a computer engine says that white only loses by a little more than a third of a pawn as far as scoring goes. It says about 0.35 uf i play a normal ruy lopez and about 0 if i play a3. Not bad.
c4 takes the center... it is the opening in which white attack the center from the flanks; the purpose is not that the knight can be developed behind a pawn :)
nothing it just is unambitious as Pfren said. One of the points of the opening is to gain space in the center unless you are playing a hyper modern opening and a3 also doesn't do anything unless you're trying some b4 thing but you should play more in the center.
Hypermodern openings don't work. They are simply objectively inferior.
please explain the kid, kia, nimzo- indian and queen's indian to me. Are they inferior? Nimzo scores nearly 50% in the database which is alot better than most sicilians. Oh and add caro kann and french to you're list and pirc.
I'm not being unabitious. Ambitious means willing to succeed. The French Defense usually assures Black at least equality, unless White plays a pawn sacrifice variation in the Tarrasch with Nf3. Many times, since people are so bad at playing the French, Black will get at an advantage. So, by playing 1...a3, I'm going into an opening in which I know there's pretty much a certain chance of equality and more likely an advantage. This means I'm willing to succeed. Which means I'm being ambitious by playing 1.a3.
If Black plays 1...d5, not a problem either. I'll just play the Benko Gambit Reversed +1 tempo. In the Benko Gambit Reversed, White has clear compensation. The Benko Gambit is a fighting opening on the queen side. Sounds pretty abitious to me.
Don't judge the first move and make assumptions. And I know you're supposed to take control of the center, and in both the French and Benko Reversed, White starts doing that the next move...
I know you're supposed to play in the center until the center closes off. Then wing activity begins. So both openings are fighting for the center and are ambitious.
I don't see the problem here with 1.a3.
1. C4 does not work? Hmm...wonder then why Bobby Fischer used it against Spassky in Game 6 of the 1972 championship (Fischer won the game by the way).
c4 is my 2nd opening repetoire for white
ambition is not a willingness to succeed it is the need to succeed. Not meaning to impose btw feel free to play you're opening. I play the french as black so no complaints on my part. Btw I think after a3 you should seriously consider the classical french reversed which for black is e4 e6 d4 d5 nc3 nf6 in which case after bg5 be7 e5 nfd7 BxB QxB f4 is played and after that black is supposed to play a6 so that after c5 there is no threat for white of Nb5 but if it is reversed colors you have already played a3 so it follows allong with that plan.
Crazy Move in Grunfeld! How to beat this annoying line?
by GeorgeBlackChess123 a few minutes ago
Mate in 3
by BorisBeastIvanov a few minutes ago
daily reminder to practice with houdini 3.0
by BorisBeastIvanov 3 minutes ago
12/9/2013 - Mate in 3
by molskaya488 3 minutes ago
by Twinchicky 5 minutes ago
How to 'decipher' Fritz comments
by aggressivesociopath 7 minutes ago
Cheap Wal-Mart Paperback Tactics
by HessianWarrior 10 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by aerodarts 12 minutes ago
Simple basic chessboard for following instruction.
by kleelof 13 minutes ago
Could Spassky have beaten Fischer?
by FromMuToYou 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!