Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Qc7


  • 19 months ago · Quote · #1

    Roeczak

    Opinions??

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #2

    NeuroMind

    I'm no chess expert by any means...but it seems like a reasonable opening to me, perhaps a sicilian hybrid? 

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #3

    pellik

    Qc7 is a faily common move, I imagine someone is just playing move order tricks to try and confuse you. You should expect to see ...e6 before long.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #4

    VULPES_VULPES

    Can Pfren comment on this?

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #5

    InfiniteFlash

    doesn't white just play 3.c3 and play d4 next move?

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #6

    Roeczak

    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Qc7 3.c3 Nf6 =

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #7

    InfiniteFlash

    Roeczak wrote:

    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Qc7 3.c3 Nf6 =

    after 3..nf6 4.e5 Nd5 5.d4, where the Qc7 move doesn't appear to be obviously useful. tbh, i think white is a bit better, the Qc7 move compared to the normal nc6 (mainline alapin), seems to be not as effective.

    It's not even this setup that seems a bit suspicious, I am sure that white has some closed sicilian setups in which the Qc7 move is not so useful in. 

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #8

    melvinbluestone

    I guess somebody should mention the name of this line: It's called the Quinteros Variation, after the Argentine GM. It's an interesting idea for black, but as I don't play the Sicilian, I've never tried it. I don't think it's considered out-n-out bad, just not very popular. After 3.Nc3 e6 4.d4, black already has problems. And if 3...Nc6 4.Bb5 followed by O-O, and again I think white has the initiative.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #9

    melvinbluestone

    @jempty_method:  I stand corrected! I mixed up my transpositions. At least I was right about the name. After 4...cxd4, white can also try 5.Nb5, but I think that, theoretically, although white gets a lot of pressure, black is supposed to be able to equalize. I found this game from 2005 (with 2nd & 3rd moves transposed), between two 2600+ players. Black hangs on doggedly in the face of a pretty violent attack. Like I said, 2...Qc7 is an interesting idea, but I think most players prefer not to place the queen so early, showing their hand, so to speak. Also, as mentioned before, against anti-sicilian lines, like 2.c3, the queen's position may be problematic.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #11

    SmyslovFan

    I agree completely, pfren! This seems like another gambit idea for experienced Black players. If white tries to "punish" Black, it backfires. Otherwise, Black can probably gain a few minutes on the clock with his unusual move order.

    The best way to really take advantage of the move order may be to aim for a Maroczy bind set up or simply play 3.c3. The problem with 3.c3 is that Black gets a playable game with 3...d6 4.d4 Nf6 5.Bd3 g6, as Polgar played against Smyslov. She won that game.

    The Black Q often goes to c7 in the Sicilian. It may not be optimally placed there in Maroczy lines as in the game below.

    Here, the game resembles a sort of King's Indian where the Black Q definitely was misplaced.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #12

    melvinbluestone

    pfren wrote:

    The only "problem" I see for Black after 3.Nc3 e6 4.d4 is picking between a pretty regular Taimanov, and a pretty regular Can.

    Roeczak wrote:

    1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Qc7 3.c3 Nf6 =

    Sign your draw as soon as possible then- your opponent may recover from the brainfart.

    Is this an endorsement of 2...Qc7, or of criticism of 3.Nc3 and 3.c3? Undecided

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #15

    SmyslovFan

    Yeah, Jempty, you could reach the game position via the same move order. It probably most closely resembles a Semi-Benoni structure where Black has wasted a move with Qc7.

    I don't know why Pfren consideres 3.c3 to be objectively better than 3.c4. They both give white a very comfortable advantage. I personally prefer 3.c4 because I think it's easier to show that Blacks' Q is misplaced in those lines. But I'm not claiming an objective advantage for 3.c4 over 3.c3.

     Subjectively, I expect Black is more ready to face 3.c3 Alapin ideas than 3.c4 Maroczy Bind plans.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #16

    SmyslovFan

    pfren wrote:

    I am sure that Vadim Svjaginsev, a very strong player and lover of the bizarre, had his tongue firmly in cheek when he invented 2.Na3 against the Sicilian.

    Did you mean Zvjaginsev? He's beaten both Khalifman and Ponomariov with 2.Na3! WOW!

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #18

    skakmadurinn

    Normally Qc7 is played later in the game. 

    For example the Taimanov variation

    1. e4 - c5 2. Nf3 - e6 3. d4 - cxd4 4. Nxd4 - Nc6 5. Nc3 - a6 6. Be2 - Qc7  

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #19

    Roeczak

    BTW, I am not even supporting 2...Qc7, I am an alapin player myself and i ve never played anything else than the alapin against the sicilian

    I played 1.e4 c5 2.c3 Qc7 3.Nf3? (d4 +=) Nf6 and it lead to an equal position (pfren, what do you think of 1.e4 c5 2.c3 Qc7?)


Back to Top

Post your reply: