^ Click here to remove ads! ^

2 knights defense

Jump to forum:
 
9th January 2008, 10:41am
#1
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

hi

I got in all sorts of trouble when, as white, I played:

1. e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. ed b4

9th January 2008, 10:43am
#2
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

I then tried 6. Bxc4 Qxd5 7. Bxc6+ Qxc6 0-0 and was quickly under major attack.  anyone know a good line against this, for white?

        thanks.

9th January 2008, 10:44am
#3
by Absurd
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 183

As Black, that's the sequence I like to play in the Two Knights Defense. It's called the Ulvestad variation, and I recommend you check this out on it:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx-J71v3JkU 


9th January 2008, 10:47am
#4
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

got an error message from youtube...

The url contained a malformed video id.

 

9th January 2008, 10:51am
#5
by Absurd
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 183
Search for Ulvestad on Youtube, and you will find it manually.
9th January 2008, 10:54am
#6
by camdawg7
Newcastle United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 186
maybe instead of Bb5 do c6
9th January 2008, 11:05am
#7
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

thanks that was very helpful!

11th January 2008, 06:58pm
#8
by bhikkhuOmer
Newton, MA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2
jimr wrote:

hi

I got in all sorts of trouble when, as white, I played:

1. e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. ed b4


 

13th January 2008, 07:42am
#9
by MichaelHarris
NewJersey United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 14
Mr.R wat were you thinking? Your should know to develope more pieces. Now I don't konw if you were put in that stuation by force or if you were be foolish.But that really is a sticky situation
13th January 2008, 07:50am
#10
by calvinhobbesliker
a 2 story house in San Jose, California United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 1334
the best move here is Bf1
13th January 2008, 08:49am
#11
by Magicmunky
Cambridgeshire United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 89

Keniloworth Chess club have some stuff by Michael Goeller on the Ulvestad I think, usually his analysis is decent.

Sometime ago I think Chesscafe.com had some articles on the Traxler too,

13th January 2008, 09:18am
#12
by benws
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1219
4. Ng5 isn't very good I suggest the simple 4. Nc3 or 4. d3.
13th January 2008, 09:22am
#13
by Magicmunky
Cambridgeshire United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 89
benws wrote: 4. Ng5 isn't very good I suggest the simple 4. Nc3 or 4. d3.

Some strong correspondance chess players like Tim Harding seem to disagree with you on this one, to say a move "isn't very good" is to neglect the chance to learn something new.

13th January 2008, 10:11am
#14
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

4. Ng5 is very playable.  even in the game I just quoted above, I ended up winning, after black played an inaccurate move and I defended well.  I have a very good record with Ng5.  both Nc3 and d3 seem passive alterntives to me, I think the main alternative is 4. d4.  or avoid the whole thing by wading into the ruy lopez swamp...

check out my game against tylerdiablo if you want to see the whole game.

13th January 2008, 01:14pm
#15
by pushingwood
W. Chicago United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 31
After 5...b5 6.Bf1 is the move (hard to find!), then if 6...Qxd5 7.Nc3...There's nothing wrong with 4.Ng5, but you gotta be willing to defend for a while, Black gets a lot of active play for the pawn.
30th January 2008, 01:22pm
#16
by EnGliSHCheSsPlAy
Italy Italy
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 318
thx for your comment..I have just added u..as a friend! keep in touch!Cool
25th February 2008, 07:56am
#17
by tukmol
manila Philippines
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 23

what about instead of Bxc6 you play c4?

 


25th February 2008, 10:23am
#18
by jimr
south NJ United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 35

yes I agree...ECO gives only Nc3 there but I like c4 better.  but 6. Bf1 gives white a clear advantage, IMHO.

 


27th February 2008, 08:01am
#19
by tukmol
manila Philippines
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 23
what advantage?i think its a loss of tempo
27th February 2008, 09:21am
#20
by Absurd
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 183

The loss of a tempo is tactically justified, as it defends g2 after black plays Qxd5.


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.