This is what I would consider to be a "semi-common" situation. Obviously 3 ... a6 is fairly common after a knight to king or queen pin, (Particularly in this example, I'd like to focus on the pin found in the spanish) But sometimes I will find a player who likes to push the b pawn and force my bishop onto the kingside castled kings diagonal (which with rare exception is where the king will be casteling to). I almost never mind this, since I really haven't lost much(as far as I can tell) by moving my bishop for 3 consecutive moves since black hasn't been developing and I am now on the kings diagnal. I'm very curious though, because these are a developing move in the sicilian usually preparing to bring up the queenside bishop...
Really I would just like to hear what some of the more experienced players think about this pawn advancement for both black and white.
It's fine for both, look up Zaitsev, Archangel/archangelsk, and Karpob variations.
The main drawback to it is that it can prove to be a weakness (attackable by a later a4 from White). That can be true in the Sicilian as well...although I think that Black having the open c-file gives him more play there.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.