16230 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't remember where I first came across this line, but I was wondering what the theory on it is. Considering how little it is played, I would guess that there is something wrong with it, but I'm not sure.
i think probably it is good not to take that pawn because of the above line
6.Qh5+,Kg8 7.Qd5+,e6 8.Qxe4,d5 9.Qxd4,Nc6 now what?
I guess there you would just move the queen back and accept being down development in exchange for the king's somewhat open position and the position of the h8 rook. I'm guessing White would, in some order, put his knights on f3 and d2, kingside castle, and maybe try for b3, Bb2, c4 at some point.
As I said, I'm not sure what the theoretical assessment would be in any of these positions. But at least that position looks like it has more imbalances for active play (which is what SMG players usually look for), instead of the normal declined position where I can't tell how to attack for White.
To Oran's point, I have seen 4... e6, but then 5. e5 is transposing into the main declined line except Black has played e6 instead of Nb6 (meaning White could possibly take the knight and play against the doubled IQPs or just play normally).
Playing the normal alapin mainline is definitely preferable. In the most humanistic line, i do not believe white will acquire decent comp in this line. I think i tried to tell you why the other day, but we never got around to it.
Now certainly, you should play 4.e5 instead of this. The positions are simply better. black is probably up a pawn for nothing in 8..dxc3 line.
4.e5 Nd5 5.Qxd4 is something I briefly glanced at and saw in Esserman's book. Take a look at the morra-declined chapters first.
"Battle of the Legends: Kasparov Vs. Short"
New to Chess - Where to start?
by The_Vision a few minutes ago
What's your favorite excuse for why you lost a game of chess?
by NewArdweaden a few minutes ago
Kasparov vs Short 2015
by NewArdweaden 5 minutes ago
Kasparov-Short Pool was right!
by NewArdweaden 6 minutes ago
by FES314 8 minutes ago
by PaulEChess 13 minutes ago
anyone wanting to get friends
by RonaldJosephCote 14 minutes ago
by PaulEChess 15 minutes ago
4/26/2015 - Mate in 2
by Nanacc 15 minutes ago
1.d4 e6!? ... have you ever seen this variation?
by dpnorman 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!