14680 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Actually black has two transposition options: not only the Alapin after 1.e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. c3 Nf6 (or 3... d5), but also the French or the open Sicilian with 1. e4 c5 2. d4 e6. Now, 3. Nf3 leads to the e6 Sicilian, while 3. c3 d5 4. e5 is the advance variation of the French. Granted, most Sicilian players wouldn't feel comfortable playing the French, but that's also true about most Morra Gambit players.
3...d5 is not good, since Black has already taken on d4 and c3 is available for the b1 knight.
1.e4 c5 2.d4 e6?! is also not terribly good due to 3.d5, which is not the most desirable Schmidt-Benoni for Black.
Thanks for the comment pfren. I wasn't aware of the 3.d5 transposition (and perhaps it's not common knowledge at all, as I had a 2100 reply 2..e6 in an OTB game recently), I'd better look into it.
ghostofmaroczy, so true. I played it as black last friday on an otb tournament and won, it must be extremely frustrating to have the attack stopped and then win with the extra pawn you gave black. :)
Now for an ego-crusher go analyze the game and see all the mistakes your opponent made that let you off the hook. Better yet post it here so we all can analyze it.
It's no more frustrating to lose playing gambits than losing normally.I actually think it's less frustrating since even if you lose with the Smith-Morra you know you went for it and played fun, exciting chess.
A lot of endgames with just an extra pawn are drawn. Thus if black makes a mistake he loses, while if white makes a mistake he often still gets a draw.
Perhaps some IMs and GMs who are condescending of the gambit are so because they're jealous that at their level where people never make mistakes they can't play them. Instead they must play things like the Berlin Wall defense.
FriendlySquid, just did so yesterday. The game was, in fact, pretty awful. I made a couple of (luckily) small mistakes, and ended up very very back in development (like he had everything but the rooks and a knight playing, and I had a pawn on a6 and another on e6). However, the placed the rooks on the e and d files instead of d and c, and that lifted up a lot of pressure. And finally, he lost a pawn on a knight move, he miscalculated and in between move. But my coach said it was a very mediocre game...The best of all, the score.
Congratulations on the win, and sorry if I seemed a bit touchy, I just get defensive of my gambit openings since people are wrongly being condescending to them all the time.
When I first started chess I read and heard from so many people that "The Smith-Morra gambit is an unsound opening, etc" that I started to view this gambit with condescension too. Then as I analyzed my wins against it I saw there was almost always that moment in the game where white would suddenly get a big spike of advantage, just that my opponents were often missing this opportunity.
As I recall, at least once this spike of white advantage was because they could have done a bishop sacrifice on d5, and this was on a game where I had played e6 as I used to use the Nge7 lines before switching to what I use now, the kingside fianchetto variation.
This is kind of a Smith-Morra, with the gambit on c3.
#49 is how NOT to play the Morra as white (4.c3?! Nf6! and white has no convenient way to defend the e4 pawn, leaving aside the meek 5.Qxd4).
Use the Chicago defense with the rook lift and you should use the extra pawn.
You should accept the gambit and do the chicago defense or you should transpose into the alpain sicillian
يجب أن تقبل هذه المناورة والقيام الدفاع شيكاغو أو يجب تبديل في sicillian alpain
what to do about opponents like this
by kaynight a few minutes ago
by kaynight 3 minutes ago
A Colle-Zuckertort question.
by Dolphin27 8 minutes ago
how to make plan
by Trevor-D 9 minutes ago
10/21/2014 - Mate in 3
by FredBatchelor 12 minutes ago
huge rating jump
by Sred 14 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by pdila 15 minutes ago
My live standard rating's 1735???
by aman_makhija 15 minutes ago
by SocialPanda 25 minutes ago
Is there a link between performance in chess and general intelligence?
by SilentKnighte5 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!