10070 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
You know. I'm an "intermediate" player whom cut his teeth on the QGD Tarrasch Defense as a 1.d4 defense and the more I think about it the better that suggestion sounds.
Beyond that study tactics and try not to drop peices.. and play long games, 3 days per move.. Hundreds of them.
Sorry, but "beginners should play the QGD to learn fundamentals" is just dogmatic crap IMO. I never replied with ...d5 to 1.d4 or 1...e5 to 1.e4 even as a beginner because I simply hated the resulting symmetrical positions. You have to play what you're comfortable with.
As a BEGINNER??? As a Beginner players learn how the horsey moves. Beginners don't hate symmetry - they don't even know what symmetry is. I call dogcrap.
You're being way too patronizing towards beginners. I distinctly remember after having taught me the rules the first thing my old man did was buy me a collection of annotated master games sorted by opening. As I played through these, even though I was obviously a total patzer I nonetheless quickly developed a feel for which opening setups were to my taste and which weren't.
With all do respect, I believe the initial dislike of symmetrical positions comes from beginners simply being unable to find moves that look like they do something. With openings like the KID or Benoni there are things like pawn breaks or pawn storms that at least give a player a" feeling of direction."
However when those players are forced down more classical lines such as 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5 7.O-O Nc6 8.Re1 or 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nf3 where White refuses to play d5 because "it moves a piece twice in the opening" beginners with the Black pieces don't fare as well since there are no thematic pawn storms or traps for them to play.
It's probably the reason why things like the exchange French or Slav are so disliked as well.
The one and only way a beginner may understand and employ hypermodern openings succesfully, is cheating.
I agree that a beginner should be exposed to various openings in the form of annotated games with various openings, NOT theory on various openings. However, those openings should be confined to classical openings. Queen's Gambit (Accepted, Declined, Slav), Nimzo-Indian, etc (QP Openings where Black doesn't relinquish e4 so easily), Ruy Lopez, Petroff, Philidor, French, Caro-Kann, non-theoretical Sicilians (i.e. Taimanov, Kan, etc - Avoid Dragons and Najdorfs), and determine from that confined list what matches your style of play.
That said, the best way is possibly to develop your first opening like a baby develops being left- or right-handed. Naturally. I played a bunch of blitz games in college, not knowing anything other than the rules and having played occasional off-hand games for 12 years prior, and I played what "felt right" after trying a few things, and low and behold, I asked if what I was playing had a name, and the response? "Yes, that's the French Defense". There's how I became a French player for 10 years before moving on to what is more my style of play.
When I started learning openings as a strong beginner, I favored Indian defenses and the Sicilian. I won a lot of games, but my positional understanding was set back until I learned to play the Slav and Semi-Slav. I recommend that beginners play 1.e4 for 100 games, then 1.d4 for 100 more. From the Black side, both of these moves should be met with the same for 100 games. The number 100 is arbitrary and means "extensive experience."
is scandinavian a good defence
by amoghkannan a few minutes ago
by GM_Maggy 2 minutes ago
by GM_Maggy 4 minutes ago
10/25/2014 - White To Draw
by mizanurrahmannur 4 minutes ago
Ratings... How accurate do you think they are in here?
by VernalFire 5 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by lvali40 16 minutes ago
Trysts is gone?! :(
by Mersaphe 20 minutes ago
Mind games: What's going on?
by ElKitch 27 minutes ago
Thoughts on the Standard Rating Boost
by steve_bute 28 minutes ago
Carlsen vs Anand 2014 world Chess Championship Thread
by LuftWaffles 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!