9891 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
You know. I'm an "intermediate" player whom cut his teeth on the QGD Tarrasch Defense as a 1.d4 defense and the more I think about it the better that suggestion sounds.
Beyond that study tactics and try not to drop peices.. and play long games, 3 days per move.. Hundreds of them.
Sorry, but "beginners should play the QGD to learn fundamentals" is just dogmatic crap IMO. I never replied with ...d5 to 1.d4 or 1...e5 to 1.e4 even as a beginner because I simply hated the resulting symmetrical positions. You have to play what you're comfortable with.
As a BEGINNER??? As a Beginner players learn how the horsey moves. Beginners don't hate symmetry - they don't even know what symmetry is. I call dogcrap.
You're being way too patronizing towards beginners. I distinctly remember after having taught me the rules the first thing my old man did was buy me a collection of annotated master games sorted by opening. As I played through these, even though I was obviously a total patzer I nonetheless quickly developed a feel for which opening setups were to my taste and which weren't.
With all do respect, I believe the initial dislike of symmetrical positions comes from beginners simply being unable to find moves that look like they do something. With openings like the KID or Benoni there are things like pawn breaks or pawn storms that at least give a player a" feeling of direction."
However when those players are forced down more classical lines such as 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5 7.O-O Nc6 8.Re1 or 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nf3 where White refuses to play d5 because "it moves a piece twice in the opening" beginners with the Black pieces don't fare as well since there are no thematic pawn storms or traps for them to play.
It's probably the reason why things like the exchange French or Slav are so disliked as well.
The one and only way a beginner may understand and employ hypermodern openings succesfully, is cheating.
I agree that a beginner should be exposed to various openings in the form of annotated games with various openings, NOT theory on various openings. However, those openings should be confined to classical openings. Queen's Gambit (Accepted, Declined, Slav), Nimzo-Indian, etc (QP Openings where Black doesn't relinquish e4 so easily), Ruy Lopez, Petroff, Philidor, French, Caro-Kann, non-theoretical Sicilians (i.e. Taimanov, Kan, etc - Avoid Dragons and Najdorfs), and determine from that confined list what matches your style of play.
That said, the best way is possibly to develop your first opening like a baby develops being left- or right-handed. Naturally. I played a bunch of blitz games in college, not knowing anything other than the rules and having played occasional off-hand games for 12 years prior, and I played what "felt right" after trying a few things, and low and behold, I asked if what I was playing had a name, and the response? "Yes, that's the French Defense". There's how I became a French player for 10 years before moving on to what is more my style of play.
When I started learning openings as a strong beginner, I favored Indian defenses and the Sicilian. I won a lot of games, but my positional understanding was set back until I learned to play the Slav and Semi-Slav. I recommend that beginners play 1.e4 for 100 games, then 1.d4 for 100 more. From the Black side, both of these moves should be met with the same for 100 games. The number 100 is arbitrary and means "extensive experience."
4/21/2014 - One And Done
by iMacChess a few minutes ago
Losing in Chess gives more pain than losing in any other sport.
by kaynight 3 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by BigLew 5 minutes ago
Mass of dumb begineers
by AlCzervik 6 minutes ago
When / how was chess first "solved" by a software program?
by ChessBloodBathHouse 11 minutes ago
FREE DIAMOND MEMBERSHIP FOR WHO GETS THIS RIGHT!
by Pastuszek 12 minutes ago
is there a win here?
by Alkimisticus 14 minutes ago
Thank you and sorry
by AlCzervik 16 minutes ago
4/18/2014 - Steinikov - Jaskoy, USSR 1988
by rupali1998 22 minutes ago
4/19/2014 - Tisdall - Lee, London 1981
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!