15105 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Are you saying I engine too, please tell me which game, and I will analyze my moves vs my engine like I did with the sample game shown to gavinator. I can prove my innocence, and you guys can only give ratings.
yeah and then america came in and shut him up.
The only purpose of that was nationalism, which IMO hardly applies to America anymore.
I am with shepi on this one except its 8 our of 25 or arround 32% which might cause alert, but any 1300 could see those tactics.
No, the first three moves were given in the tournament. And most 1700s would see that Qd6 or Bh3 win positionally, I just wasn't paying attetion, and I definately wasn't engining. 32% when one is allowed opening databases is actually a quite small number as well.
Also, that analysis of that game took thirty minutes at least, just to write down my moves and what the engine suggested, without any actual analysis or any improvement in my chess. I am sick of you idiot garbage players accusing me of cheating, wasting my time, and making me look bad.
Also, haven't you noticed that most people on this site have higher correspondance ratings than blitz. If you haven't, look again.
That's probably because chess.com doesn't do anything about the people who engine...
The more players that engine the lower the ratings are. It's harder for players to get high ratings in standard because at that time control everyone they're playing is engining. YERESLOV, YOU BETTER NAME THE GAME YOU REFERENCED OR DELETE THAT COMMENT
If anyone claims I cheated again, I will report them. Please back up your claims with evidence, not, "oh, I looked at this game, and I think he might have used an engine." Or "He engines because in CC everyone engines". This seems to be how Yereslov and Gavinator support their arguments.
If you suspect someone, please use the top corner Help link. When that page opens, click on the left side option where it says Contact Us and submit a 'Suspected Cheat' ticket.
Also see this page
We provide tools to report cheating to our staff. But having several constant and redundant threads on the topic that circulate with the same questions and comments over and over again isn't helpful, and instead causes people to worry more than they need to. If you want to discuss cheating, please do it in this group
"Reykjavik Open, Round 9 | Commentary by FM Ingvar Johannesson & Fiona Steil-Antoni"
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by einstein99 a few minutes ago
Leechers of chess.com
by RonaldJosephCote a few minutes ago
Is there any defense against pathetic players?
by Sred a few minutes ago
What's this Nonsense about 200 Bans maximum?
by Talmapai a few minutes ago
Creating traps vs positional play
by TheGrobe a few minutes ago
by Bardu a few minutes ago
Aging in chess.
by Gomer_Pyle 3 minutes ago
3/11/2014 - Too Much Attack, Not Enough Defense
by Gypswick 7 minutes ago
Validity of stalemate rule discussion!
by TheGrobe 8 minutes ago
mAGNUS CARLSEN VS houdini 2 PRO
by psuperpepe 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!