16257 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Isn't chess a funny old game in that we as players can never really totally agree on much of anything that isn't total forced..
Mind you it doesn't really help when questions are asked based on incorrect play and a faulty supposition.
If my standard rating was under 1000 I'd keep my opinions to myself. You barely know how the horsie moves.... just saying.
in an L shape?
In response to the OP, NO! You are NOT the only one that thinks the KG is trash!
I make TWO of us that think the KG is utter garbage!
and your Chess.com rating of 1463 makes you a grandmaster how?...
There are many better openings, I think it was Kramnik who said something like that with the King's Gambit white destroys his own position and gives up a pawn at the same time. Carlsen is the only top player to have used it in a classical game for decades, and it doesn't just have to do with fashion. Nimzowitsch and Keres played the Latvian Gambit once in a while but no top player would play it today. Then it's another thing what is fun on amateur level, but to me there are more exciting openings than the King's Gambit.
I don't see anywhere that I claimed to be a great chess player. But the OP has a complete beginner rating and is calling an opening "trash," when that opening has been used by plenty of grandmasters. I can't find a place where I condemned an entire opening while barely understanding what a fork is. Please let me know if I ever do such a thing.
The KG scares me, so I play the faulkbeer. And a bad line at that, but not many on my level like the direct refutation ... so i get away with it hehehe
You should be able to beat Nigel Short then if it is trash.
No offense, and I typically respect what you have to say, but Short could beat you and me using the Basman's Defense (1.e4,g5?! or maybe even ?) and even ...f6? If Paul Morphy of all people could lose against 1...f6?? (Why is it called Barnes' Defense again?) it could damn well happen to us, especially against world class opposition.
And the King's Gambit, as dubious as it is nowadays, is much sounder than the Barnes'.
Boris Spassky was the "Knight of the King's Gambit" and won with it often. Bobby Fisher won with it many times as well. After losing to Boris Spassky he wrote the famous "A Bust to the King's Gambit" article. Yet he won playing the KG after publishing the article. Hardly sounds like TRASH to me.
I don't play it. But if it makes for a fun game, why not try it?
The Falkbeer is a great move. I see 2...Bc5 recommended for those who don't know the theory but am personally more comfortable with 2...d5!? myself. There's an interesting game Carlsen won against it but mostly for the endgame:
Bobby Fisher won with it many times as well. After losing to Boris Spassky he wrote the famous "A Bust to the King's Gambit" article. Yet he won playing the KG after publishing the article. Hardly sounds like TRASH to me.
He claimed to have "refuted" the King's Knight Variation with the Fischer Defense, but he played the Bishop's Gambit Variation instead, so it isn't as hypocritical as it may seem.
I think it's generally agreed that the KG isn't the best choice for White at all, but it definitely leads to some interesting play. I occasionally use it whenever I decide to mix it up, and I have a friend who uses it regularly and performs well with it, but the majority of people tend to play other openings, such as the Ruy Lopez, Scotch, and even Italian, instead of the King's Gambit, and admittedly for good reasons.
short answer yes
Once Fischer's 53 year old article is mentioned I generally stop following a thread because it usually brings out the tin foil hat brigade who refuse to believe that their deity might have got it slightly somewhat..well..wrong.
No, you are not the only one who thinks this. However, everyone who thinks this is wrong.
what does magnus carlsen see when he sees a chessboard
by I_Am_Second 5 minutes ago
Conditional move suggestion
by notmtwain 12 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by camberfoil 15 minutes ago
8/22/2014 - White To Draw
by FredBatchelor 22 minutes ago
Judit Polgar: the greatest prodigy ever ? Is a JOKE!
by With_every_step 23 minutes ago
Out of Time - with Vacation
by mnhsr 26 minutes ago
by Zobral 26 minutes ago
Is this true?
by TRANKD 28 minutes ago
Chess.com rate 1-10
by Pranjal588 33 minutes ago
What Major (or Minor) Things Did You Learn To Move Up in 100+ Ratings?
by mnhsr 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!