16276 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I encountered this interesting line yesterday and thought it deserves some analysis:
After 5. d4, the game transposed to a variation of the Steinitz Variation of the French Defense. It usually arises after 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Nf3. Most popular is 5. f4, when you have competing pawn chains, but 5. Nf3 is the second most popular move. Here is what Steffen Pedersen has to say about the 5. Nf3 line in his book The Main Line French: 3. Nc3:
"This is a sensible developing move, but now White cannot support his centre with c3 and/or f4 because the pawns are both blocked by knights. Therefore Black can break up the centre with ...c5 and ...f6. This leads to an interesting strategic struggle since the pawn-structure is defined by white pawns on the second rank (a-c and f-h) against the three black pawn islands a7+b7, d5+e6 and g7+h7. This means White will be attempting to gain control over the central dark squares, e5 in particular, while Black in turn will try to break this stronghold and seek counterplay on the semi-open c- and f-files."
Here is his main line:
1. e4 e62. d4 d53. Nc3 Nf64. e5 Nfd75. Nf3 c56. dxc5 Nc67. Bf4 Bxc58. Bd3 f69. exf6 Nxf610. 0-0 0-011. Ne5 Bd712. Qe2 Qe713. Rae1 Rae814. Kh1 a615. Bg3 Nxe516. Bxe5 Bc6
Rogers-Psakhis, Wijk aan Zee, 1997, was agreed drawn after 17. a3 due to the solidity of 17. ...g6 followed by ...Nd7.
Was this game at the latest NSCC? If so, which round? I assume you were white in this game.
It's not a game I played. If you look at the note to White's 21st, I credited the game as Roy Chowdhury - Mueller 2005 and gave an improvement. Actually this was shown to me by a friend at the Evanston club on Tuesday.
I prefer the Tarrasch, and I doubt White has anything after the more intuitive 8...Nc6.
Ah, looks like a battle between two Wisconsinites. Well, now I know what Mueller plays!
18... 0-0 was a blunder. ...f6 is better, but in all the lines I analyzed, White ends up winning eventually.
I'm only a 2050 player so my analysis may not be the best, but I consider the bishop misplaced on c5 in the opening (even though it "seems" the most natural), and I always recapture with ...nc5 for that reason. It also avoids this line, which, the more I look at it, looks more and more like a solid victory for white.
...Nxc5 is another line. Pedersen gives that one in his notes as an alternative , too.
Yes...I have already found this in my own independent analysis, at the end white has probably a decisive advantage. It is not clear though. I remember one very funny line with 18..f6 19.Nf7 O-O
Elubas and I talked about this a few months ago on live, and we came to the conclusion its likely much better for white, but nothing decisive yet.
It is a nice combination though really.
black can't play the natural Bxf2+, this is nearly a blunder.
probably has to play some h6, i played a standard game in this line a few months ago, and got a quite playable position. White has very good attacking chances on the kingside though.
Btw, either knight sack after you win the queen on g5, is quite playable, its not clear which is better atm.
Why is Bxf2+ natural? Black is underdeveloped and attacking while the king is still in the center; that is the most unnatural idea I know of in chess.
It is natural because on the surface it looks like it wins a pawn atleast (missing the Kd2 idea, most chess players would, and without it, white is dead, therefore its natural), deeper analysis reveals otherwise though to "refute" the idea entirely ---- pawn grabbing while underdeveloped = unadvisable.
"2nd Gashimov Memorial, Round 5 | Host: GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko"
by GuessWhoIAm a few minutes ago
How fast can you +800pts?
by WhoIsHe17 a few minutes ago
Nigel Short: Women's brains not chess brains
by power_2_the_people 3 minutes ago
4/21/2015 - No Way Out
by bajomis 4 minutes ago
How to reach 2000 ELO ?
by CrimeZone 5 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "Kasparov - Short 2015"
by clarapca 10 minutes ago
Simple tactics trainer app
by Mikado777 10 minutes ago
English Qb3 vs. Grunfeld
by dpnorman 10 minutes ago
Players who move fast in long time control games
by fourpawnskewer 13 minutes ago
by X_PLAYER_J_X 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!