11911 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What type of style, positions, and endgames suit you? Finding a good repertoire you like isn't too hard but we can make better recomendations if you explain more about yourself.
Generally I would consider myself quite a slow positional player, I like to get my pieces developed and have a "stable" position before I launch any kind of attack. Ideally this would lead to an endgame with as few pieces left on the board as possible as I do best in simplified end games.
HEY!, CHECK MY AWSOME NEW YOUTUBE VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWq5bHGcEjw&feature=relmfu...IT'S MY VERSION OF MOVING LIKE BERNIE, IT'S PRETTY CRAZY..WE WENT INTO SHOPS AND STUFF. CHECK IT OUT, IF YOU LIKE IT SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL..AS WE ARE PLANNING TO MAKE MORE VIDEOS IF THIS ONE CAN REACH TO 1000 VIEWS. THANKS ALOT
Thanks; I'll add them to my list.
Some good advice in here.
You'd be hard pressed to find a repertoire that would allow you to focus on a handful of specific structures better than 1...e6 vs. everything, with a French and a Stonewall and transpositions between them.
My games all look pretty much the same in the middle game. Playing against a bunch of different Pirc players is much different than playing it yourself every game.
The semi-tarrasch Aboaisha just recommended is a garbage defense. Learn about the way computers evaluate positions before thinking you have instant equality playing that junk because your computer likes it on move 2. There is no need for 4. Nf3 or anything like that as neither retreat for the knight after 3. e4 is particularly good. Once you reach the level where your opponents know how to use the center it all but dissappears. I punched it into my database to see if I was missing something about Nf3 and sorted the games by black elo. The highest rated black player to play it was 2500 and lost to an expert.
I guess you mean 4.e4.
This is exactly what Black is hoping for, for the reasons already explained.
4.Nf3 first does the trick, though.
Oh, and this is NOT a semi-Tarrasch (which goes 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Nf3 c5 5.cd5 Nxd5).
You can tell how much respect I have for it that I don't even know enough theory to get the name right.
I just don't see black getting to play a quick e5 as a problem for white. After ...e5 Nf3 exd4 Nxd4 white has a center pawn, a slight development advantage, good centralization. It just looks like a good position. Granted I haven't looked that deeply so maybe I will start play Nf3 first.
Another option is that you can play a caro-slav structure against pretty much everything. With just a few exceptions the only real difference you'll ever see is whether you have to take on c4 before you can develop your light square bishop to f5. What's great is that once you leave theory the middle game plans are pretty similar (e5 or c5), too. In both cases the winning chances usually revolve around white needing to accept some structural weaknesses if he wants to attack, although once in a while you get lucky and take and keep a pawn on c4.
Your best bet would be to stop using words like "whilst" and "paradigms", but follow your heart.
I like the Rat for this. I have played it against e4,d4 and the English openings. I usually have options, a chance to fight for central control, and attacking chances in the end game, whether I chose to castle to either side.
As it happens I have actually decided to use the Taimanov variation of the Sicilian (for the moment anyway), although the move order varies greatly I find it does generate the same positions and I'm finding a lot of the positions have the same sort of ideas as my Queen's Gambit system.
Thanks a lot for the advice.
I use "1. ... e6 against everything" as my main black opening as I found that it gives me quite consistent positions. Usually 1. d4 players will not play 2. e4 to enter the French, but 2. c4 to enter the Queen's Gambit Declined which does not give as much active play as the French, but the positions and arising problems you have to deal with are somewhat similar, like the "bad bishop" on c8 and the general pawn structure.
A book recently came out that I did the cover for that is based on that concept. It's called "A Rock-Solid Opening Repertoire for Black". Here's the Gambit page on it:
It's called the Marshall Defense to the Queen's Gambit, first of all. And yes it is terrible.
4.Nf3 is better than an immediate 4.e4 because it prevents black from the counter-punch e5. To illustrate it with ridiculously hyperbolic metaphors, by playing the Marshall Defense Black kicked himself in the shin and is currently writhing in pain on the ground struggling to get up. With 4.e4 you reach out your hand for him to pull himself to his feet; he's still visibly in pain, but he sees some light on the horizon promising relief. With 4.Nf3 you start laughing at him and kick him some more instead.
Cozy an comfortable for black lol :D You find it let me know!!! :)
The Slav Proper (not Semi-Slav) and Caro-Kann
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 dxc4 5.a4 Bf5
White can try the gambits 5.e3 or 5.e4 too btw and you will see this kinda often.
As black I really think you have to improvise more based on the circumstances of the particular game and your opponent. For instance, certain lines are great for equalising and drawish positions, whilst certain lines give more chance of a win but are more dangerous. Up to a certain level of opponent d5 will more often than not give you an equal fighting chance against d4 and in quite steady positions. But with high rated players an indian defense may be more appropriate.
Against e4, I don't think I could recommend a steady way of playing, as all the best ways to respond are more dynamic and dangerous, in my opinion, these being e5, the sicilian and the french.
The Scheveningen Sicilian structure is a good one for getting your pieces into position, and there is really not much white can do thats any good to stop you in the first 10 moves or so.
You only have limited control over what type of endings you will see, and precisely half control over the middlegame pawn structures. Don't be so much concerned with playing similar games all the time.
It's great to learn more about common types of structures, but if you avoid other structures in the meantime you will always be at a disadvantage when you stumble or are forced into them.
Don't be afraid to try new things. Many players adopt a quieter positional style to compensate for tactical oversights. But as you get stronger, you will see more and more of the tactics, too.
12/5/2013 - Too Many Attackers, Too Little Defenders
by Hrishikesh890 a few minutes ago
Novag Citrine and Arena GUI
by NigelNice a few minutes ago
Positional response to e4?
by Yaroslavl 18 minutes ago
what is this whole "carlsen plays like a computer" nonsense
by kco 20 minutes ago
Fun Chess Puzzles
by Beyond42 30 minutes ago
Autoplay the only SINGLE move option
by deepakbhide 30 minutes ago
Resign repeated times
by Ariel_Demian 35 minutes ago
QG - Tarrasch vs Albin Counter Gambit
by manfredmann 44 minutes ago
12/2/2013 - Mate in 2
by Folguk 45 minutes ago
Can Anyone Become Grandmaster?
by ponz111 49 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!