17658 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This was a fun Budapest gambit blitz game miniature...
@pfren: I think there is a good reason to play Bf4 before Nf3. 3 Nf3 is met by 3... Bc4 forcing e3 and locking whites dark-square-bishy inside the pawn chain. And (if I remember correctly) winning the pawn back in an uncomplicated manner.
Gelfand - Rapport 0-1:
in blitz game is normal weapon for yuor opponents
I do not know ANY good reason to play Bf4 BEFORE Nf3: the bishop is perfectly placed at b2. White would have a very safe positional advantage in the game with the simple 10.b3 instead of 10.Kh1 (and 10.Na4!? is also a good move). Gelfand's f4 was simply ill-timed.
Black's problem is not winning the pawn back- as a matter of fact, white's best strategy is not bothering about the extra pawn. It is not falling to a passive position.
The whole white concept was nicely analysed by Kiril Georgiev in his book "Squeezing the Gambits".
Well Good Sir, that was quick reply in this old thread!
I did not wish to argue with you, nor did I intend to appear assertive. I wished only to contemplate different perspectives. So please let me restart completely by asking: in your line, if black goes for the bishop check you would intercept with 5 Bd2, yes? And is that the main reason for you to avoid 4 Bf4, is to avoid the permanent complications of the doubled c-pawns (or the temporarily cramped stuff after 5 Nbd2), am I correct? And if I may kindly ask you (instead of me) to speculate, what do you think GM Seirawan's motives be for very strongly preferring the afforementioned Bf4 ?
Seirawan has a saying that in chess there are "head-hunters and pawn-grubbers". He describes himself as a pawn-grubber, he really likes to take and keep pawns, and sometimes too he'll say "gifft me the pawn".
This is probably why he chooses a line which keeps the pawn, it is based on his personal preference.
So please let me restart completely by asking: in your line, if black goes for the bishop check you would intercept with 5 Bd2, yes?
First, I would try hard to understand the point behind 4...Bb4+. I would most probably fail, and after that picking between 5.Nc3 and 5.Bd2 is a matter of taste- both look good enough for a serious advantage. Probably 5.Nc3 is the better move, as it keeps Bg5 options open. If Black wants to double white's pawns at c3/c4, he will be a couple of tempos behind the Bf4/Qd5 lines, since white does not had to play things like Bf4 and Qd5.
Are tactics really the way to go?
by NewArdweaden a few minutes ago
Whose games,Fisher, Karpov, Kasparov, Capablanca,..
by bb_gum234 2 minutes ago
Wooden Chess set
by goodknightmike 3 minutes ago
5/28/2015 - Mate in 3
by RodCarroll 3 minutes ago
by nicolidus 3 minutes ago
No points gained after opponent abandoned the game after 24 moves
by boddyfischer 3 minutes ago
On Line Turn Based Cheating
by jurassicmark 5 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by ThrillerFan 5 minutes ago
Yet more racist abuse.
by MisterBoy 5 minutes ago
When opponents don't grant you a 2nd game
by GabrieleMiceli 5 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!