13760 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
ok here are some main lines
this is known as the english opening main lines
It is good against polish people.
It is a counter to the Polish defense: 1...b5 ;)
I play it like a hyper accelerated dragon sicilian.
c4 as white I think is a mistake because it doesn't give as much central control
I usually play 1. Nf3 and 2. c4 to reach an english, not having a taste for c4 e5. By far the most common continuation I encounter is to transpose into the Maroczy bind. I don't think white is lacking in center control there at all.
I agree. Over here C4 is abbreviation for a dismissal. Like yesterday john got his C4.
I'll research main lines with c4 and show them
Ah, I was hoping for that.
This is known as mislabeling (looks like you've got a little more research to do).
main lines in master games
Sure looks like the Queen's Gambit to me...
Wait a minute! That is definitely Queen's gambit!
You got d4 c4 pawns with different move order... and " 1 c4 Nf3 2 d4 " has as many continuation as an india opening..
Opening usually means the position you reach but not the move order you make.
No opening is a mistake if you know how to play with it to your advantage.
Of course, some may be more advantageous than others...
I do love the idea the the first move can be genius. It's hard enough finding one that is, without argument, a mistake...
1.c4 is the best kept anti-sicilian secret in chess.
Kind of an "if you can't beat em, join em" solution.
For me this has usually been a mistake in the past because, I am not enough of an aggressive attacker( it is too slow for development and castling, for my style), but I would say it was genius for Fischer...
yeah koala im quite familiar with that opening
Here's another neat opening trap in the English:
Black Holes---- are you in or out ?
by The_Ghostess_Lola a few minutes ago
Loving My Old HOS Chess Set This Evening
by ROBB_CHESS 4 minutes ago
Chess channels recommendable for those who want to improve (See post #1)
by InfiniteFlash 9 minutes ago
I have engineered a new opening-any comments welcome
by Figgy20000 10 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 14 minutes ago
How to conquer the colossal obstacles of learning openings
by GodIike 14 minutes ago
Middle Game Principles
by chessmicky 15 minutes ago
Weird analysis by engines
by TBentley 19 minutes ago
Magnus Carlsen not using standard chess openings?
by Shakaali 20 minutes ago
Dedicated Chess Computer Study Advice
by tigerprowl5 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!