15777 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have found what I believe to be a novelty in the Caro-Kann fantasy variation.
Could someone who plays the fantasy variation give an opinion please?
This is a recent game I played in this line. However, after Nc3, I chickened out with e6.
Hard to tell what to make of your variation.
The databases show a number of fairly recent matchups using your line up through the knight's return to g8.
I feel like it's tough to give a fair evaluation here, because the variation shown relies pretty heavily on trading off the light squared bishops, and giving yourself that nice f5, light-squared post for the knight, once the opposing bishop isn't around to harass him.
But what is white's bishop doing on d3 to begin with? He doesn't seem to be serving any purpose there, just development for development's sake. It's a lot more common in the fantasy variation to delay development of white's KB until its strategic relevance becomes clear.
Standard attacking development, a la Be3, Qd2, etc., and you're a tempo or two down and looking down the barrel of a loaded gun.
Why would black play ...Nf6 if intending to return the knight to g8 in case of e5?
The variation I play apparently has a great score for white in the DB...http://www.chess.com/explorer/index.html?id=5896494&ply=17&black=0
1.Forcing e5 at the cost of a tempo is fine because the position is closed, plus f3 hardly counts as a constructive tempo.
2. The knight is actually best placed on g8, because it is a flexible transition to h6, f5, e7, or c6.
3. "Standard attacking development" is pretty well met:
llamalord, I think white is a little better in your line by simply offering a poison pawn sac that black cannot accept:
I think white has good endgame prospects going into this position.
Thanks for the thoughtful analysis! I'll try to come up with an improvement for black in the next couple of days. Perhaps Qb6 is wrong, seeing as it doesn't threaten anything and sets up a fork on a4. Hmmm....
It will be hard to find anything better for black. For example: 8...Qc7 9. Ng3 g6 10. Bxh6 Bxh6 11. Bxf5 and black has to go down a pawn.
ard to tell what to make of your variation.
White didn't play the obligatory prophylactic Kb1 in the given variation. After which, the black attack amounts to little. Sorry that where I am now is a little bandwidth-sparse, so I'm not going to plod through a graphic, but after Kb1...Nd7, Ne2...c4, Ng3 drives back the bishop while freeing the white's same, and Bb5, after which black's king is stranded in the middle for the remainder of the game, white is fully developed, and half of black's army lies motionless on the kingside. This is at least +/=.
The bigger issue, I think, is that white is by no means under compulsion to allow so much counterplay on the Q-side. After Be3...h4, white comes c4 and black's counterplay is squashed, while at the same time, Bf5 ideas leave b7 hopelessly weak to a suddenly mobile white queen. I'm just fiddling around on my brain board, but I don't see an easy path to equality for black here.
The move order last time was innaccurate, due to c4, which, although only +/= after dxc4, is troublesome. A better move order:
My only opinion is that playing your novelty, e6 has to be defended. Else, white could cramp all of black's position together and with Qh5 check start an attack, all from one pawn sac
My only observation is: If the Knight is so well placed on g8, then WHY did it move to f6 in the first place? It wasn't preventing any move of White's, it's "threat" on e4 merely provokes White into doing what he will have to do anyway if Black refuses to play ...d5xe4, yet it wastes two moves getting to the square upon which it is well placed . . . and started from.
If Black doesn't wish to grab the pawn and defend the gambit, his best approach is to ignore it, when the move f2-f3 only gets in the way of White's further development. White will shortly have to play e4-e5 and f3-f4 anyway if he expects to get anywhere, so Black should be using the extra tempo to advance his own plan of development instead of wasting time.
The knight is only well placed on g8 after e4-e5. Before that black should just develop normally. Anyway black will be willing to grab the e-pawn, especially in the variation (that I think is much more promising for white than e5) Nc3 Qa5!?. Next, you have the misconception that in the fantasy white's only aim if black plays solidly (I'll use the e6 line as an example) is e5 and f4. This is just a silly plan. White intends to develop normally with Nc3 and Be3, not waste time turning the game into a french that is good for black.
According to Gallagher's Starting out: the Caro-Kann, Gallagher (a fan of the fantasy) notes the main line after 3...e6:
4.Nc3 Bb4 5. Bf4 Nf6 Qd3 with the comment:
"Black was trying to tempt white into playing e5, but this advance doesn't fit in with f2-f3..."
Also, f4 doesn't make sense even after 3...Nf6:
Lastly, f3 isn't a gambit. It is sharp and aims for open positions like a gambit, and their are gambits you can play within it, but I feel like dxe4 fxe4 just rids white of the problems of f3. Plus, you can't even grab the e-pawn with anything. What you might be suggesting is that white just gambit the e-pawn after Nf6, which is more sensible. For example:
I'm not so sure. The problem is that 21...Bxb2 loses instantly to 22. Qd6++
"Black's attack is extremely strong in this variation, and his king is completely safe in the center."
Here's the thing about 4...Ng8. Black has lost two tempi. White has already used one to make the move f3, which isn't that great - though one variation above showed that it can be useful. But white has the other tempo in-hand, in that it's white's turn.
Usually the move order is 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5, and it's black's turn. So from that position, white "has" to play f3, but then gets to move again. So going into the whole discussion, we should be extremely wary of this idea for black.
The two setups that I always think about for white are the Nc3/g4 setup and the Nf3/Be2/o-o setup, championed by Nigel Short. Since white has already played f3, it makes a whole lot of sense to play the Nc3/g4 line. Note that Bd3 is maybe not best, since it sort of looks like black can play as the OP showed, to force Bf5. But in case of 5.Nc3, black still must prepare Bf5 via h5, because Bf5 right away runs into g4. The next questions for me are whether white should play Bd3 or Be2, and also after Bd3 Nh6 Nge2 Bf5, how good is Bxh6 for white?
I just don't trust this line.
Against people who know some theory youll be faced with this instead of that quite inferior line you gave for black:
Which is the same line I play after watching IM Shankland use it to dismantle GM Robson at the junior champ finals.
"Death Match 26! GM Irina Krush vs. GM Nadezhda Kosintseva-hosted by IM Danny Rensch & GM Robert Hess!"
score not correctly displayed
by FFrenchy 3 minutes ago
Mobile App Unable to Properly Manage Preset Themes
by Elektroniker 3 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by rdecredico 3 minutes ago
Does fate (or destiny) plays significant role in the success of Carlsen?
by mrhjornevik 6 minutes ago
7/26/2014 - Saonina-Tjekova 1980
by Shakilbhaia 7 minutes ago
by dnornii 11 minutes ago
Am I too late to become a master?
by ericbowiereed 12 minutes ago
andriod app update pushed out yesterday
by malcolmparfitt 16 minutes ago
New Idea in the Morra
by z99j 19 minutes ago
Arena 3.5 question
by EscherehcsE 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!