16462 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
My chess teacher says that I need to choose either e4 or d4 and stick with it... I cannot play both.
I feel like I'm choosing a wife... I can never experiment with other relationships :)
Basically, I'm an attacking player, and I like e4, but d4 and some of the interesting structures also appeal to me...
I am sad that I will be eliminating 50% of the interesting chess positions!!!
Which do I choose?
Well, I don't understand why you have to choose between two of your favorite pawn-thrusts, but you should choose whichever you are better at.If you can excell at both, wouldn't you be a potentially better player?EDIT: Thanks, now I realize why what I just said isn't the correct way of looking at it! (no sarcasm intended)
Cannot d4 be tactical and sharp also, if you choose certain variations? Or am I wrong?
I guess you should just play tactically with 1.d4.
Sure they can. Morozewitch, Tal, Shirov, Kasparov, Topalov etc all played d4. It is the player who is tactical not the opening,
How long did Kasparov play d4? Didn't he play it earlier in his career and then switched later?
There are a lot of variations within 1.d4 that are very tactical like in the Semi-Slav 5.Bg5 dxc4 (Botvinnik) or 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 (Anti-Moscow gambit) and 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 4.e4 (Marshall Gambit) or 4.Nf3 dxc4 (Noteboom). Also the Grunfeld Exchange variation with Nf3/Rb1 gambit. The Catalan (yes, the Catalan--its not boring like many ppl make it out to be) can also become very crazy in certain variations.
d4/c4 doesn't always lead to closed positions.
And theres also other lines like 1.d4 2.Nc3 (Veresov) which is more like an e4 opening actually. If you play that you also have to be ready for the CK, French, Benoni, Dutch.
Kasparov has always been a 1.d4 guy but he has played a lot of 1.e4 too. I think he played a lot of Torre Attacks when he was a kid.
you also have Nf3
Once you master one go to the next, the most important is to have fun what ever e4 d4...what ever, your teacher wants you to win, but only you know which one, with which one you win most of the time...that's the one for u!:)
Which one does your teacher play.
It is more logical to learn the e4 openings first. If you have a good grounding in all those pawn structures, but not the d4 structures, take up d4 until you are familiar with those too.
But if you aren't familiar with the ideas in the various King-pawn openings structures, you will find it easier in the long run to learn them before tackling 1 d4.
I'd have to agree with your teacher. Yes, there are some 1.e4 openings that are closed and positional; and yes, there are 1.d4 openings that are sharp, but by and large e4 is more tactical while d4 is more positional.
There are ways to minimize defense preparation against 1.d4, too. One of my early tricks against 1.d4 as black was to respond 1...d6. If my opponent played 2.e4, we're in a Pirc defense. (Or play 1...e6 for a French, or 1...c6 for a Caro-Kann, etc... anything that allows or encourages 2.e4.) Transposition is your friend, so learn alternate move orders for your favorite openings.
1.d4 d5 2.e4...the Blackmar-Diemer-Gambit is not really positional in my point of view and a good choice for attacking players.
And yet after 2. ...e6 we have a french defense - probably not ideal for someone looking to play the Blackmar-Diemer gambit.
I always play 1.d4 if i know that the black player plays Kings-Indian. I play the Four-Pawns attack. It works for me .
If you're an attacking player, 1.e4 is probably the way to go. However, it doesn't mean you must completely drop 1.d4 out of your practice : you can use it in training games, or simply with a lower frequency in regular games (like once every 5 games or something like that).
Start with 1.e4
and after 3.c4 with have the Diemer-Duhm-Gambit... :-)
or 3.Be3 the Alapin Gambit
Even with 2.Nc3 you can play the Winckelmann-Rainer-Gambit or the Aljechin-Chatard.
I prefer 2.Nc3, because i like to play as white against French...i dont know, why everyone has the opinion, BDG-players dont like to play vs. Caro-Kann or French...
When you play the BDG, you also have to prepare vs. 2...e6 and 2...c6, if not, youre right, the situation starts to get worse.
Get another coach!
Rules regarding time.
by yeres30 a few minutes ago
by scottk74 3 minutes ago
12/4/2013 - Immunity
by CaptainBlunderpants 4 minutes ago
2200 vs 2700
by Rumo75 6 minutes ago
I can die before making a move
by ilgambittoo 9 minutes ago
Who is better, Magnus Carlsen or Babe Ruth?
by pawnzischeme 10 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Somebodysson 11 minutes ago
Carlsen (White) wins
by yeres30 11 minutes ago
Daily Puzzle 12/4/13-Mate in 3
by GSHAPIROY 12 minutes ago
The Steinitz method: Stealing a pawn and winning a game with it.
by Twinchicky 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!