Yes he is a National MASTER. And Nakamura said he was WINNING, against a 2600.
Defences to the Parham Attack
Mr. Parham is a NM, IM Pfren world be able to beat him.
Nakamura is in the top ten. Are you trolling?
Nakamura wouldn't play the Parham.
http://www.365chess.com/search_result.php?search=1&m=4&n=838&ms=e4.e5.Qh5.Nc6&wid=8099
I'm sorry I didn't finish my statement. Nakamura wouldn't play the Parham in a real game against pfren, based on the fact that he hasn't played the Parham in seven years.
That tells us that white won 7 games, black won 6 games, and 4 were drawn. Which proves absolutely nothing.
No, it shows that the Parham Attack scores about the same as other major openings when you play the reasonable line.
No it doesn't, because in major openings the score is based on thousands of games, seventeen games aren't going to give an accurate comparison.
Can't play 3-0 and doesn't prove squat. How about 15-10?
The bet is that we play 5 games and you play white in every game. You play either the Parham or the Bongcloud. I give you draw odds on the match (so if it ends 2 1/2 - 2 1/2, you win). If you win, I will play my next three team match games online with white using the Parham (or somehow I will get 3 Parham games with white since obviously I can't make black play e5). If I win, you will publicly state on a separate thread to my satisfaction and never repudiate that the Parham sucks as bad as the Bongcloud.
That sounds reasonable.
Just something to resolve the argument.
NM