Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Defense against Fried Liver and Counter Attack!


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1

    truatx

    Block the bishop with the king or queen pawn and bring your horses out.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2

    Fear_ItseIf

    omg, finally a refutation to the fried liver

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3

    Scottrf

    Why didn't decades of theory ever think of this?!!

    I'm not sure how you will block with your king pawn though, and your knights will already be out.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4

    Scottrf

    I did hear TheBackyardProfessor had an excellent video on this defence.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5

    Metaknight251

    Oh, the one where he is condemning "random 2 piece attacks" and responded to Qf3+ with Ke8 and after Bxd5 claimed he had a clear advantage. 

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #7

    Vivinski

    Let me be helpful for a change

     

    or

     




  • 2 years ago · Quote · #8

    truatx

    Thanks so much for the comments and for the two move by move variations on defense. Also blocking the bishop with the queen pawn not the king pawn seems a better idea.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #9

    Scottrf

    It seems the only idea, pawns can't move backwards.

    I prefer just to play 3...Bc5 rather than Nf6 and avoid it entirely.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #10

    JamieKowalski

    truatx wrote:

    Also blocking the bishop with the queen pawn not the king pawn seems a better idea.

    It also has the advantage of being a legal move. 

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #11

    truatx

    I have also noticed that when i go for the fried liver attack first i am able to see how my opponent counters and quickly neutralizes the attack. Either that or I have a quick 4 move checkmate. For the record it has only worked once. Also i find that when i try fried liver my pieces dont get developed and i forfeit control of the center.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #12

    part12

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #13

    Scottrf

    rdecredico wrote:
    Scottrf wrote:

    It seems the only idea, pawns can't move backwards.

    I prefer just to play 3...Bc5 rather than Nf6 and avoid it entirely.

    I go ya one futher and play 3. ...Be7

    Ugly Foot in Mouth

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #14

    JamieKowalski

    re: 3... Be7, better be careful of this:



  • 2 years ago · Quote · #15

    Vivinski

    JamieKowalski wrote:

    re: 3... Be7, better be careful of this:

     



    That's a line from the Scotch gambit, It seems like white wins a piece on the spot but that's not the case, white has to give the bishop back to defend against black's threats.

    Either Bxg7 followed by Nxc3, or Nxc3 immediately

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #16

    beerainsdone

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 2 years ago · Quote · #17

    beerainsdone

    here is one matt...

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #18

    truatx

    I always thought moving that pawn forward was a good idea.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #19

    truatx

    [COMMENT DELETED]

Back to Top

Post your reply: