Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Easiest opening to learn for beginners ..


  • 2 years ago · #81

    Scottrf

    FLchessplayer wrote:
    pfren wrote:

    Uhhh, but OK. In that game Hoi is playing a French Rubinstein being (as white) a full tempo down (pushed the pawn to e4 in two moves instead of one).

    He is not worse, of course, but his win has absolutely nothing to do with the opening.

    Allow me (and Fritz!) to disagree. And (also) White gets a Q-side majority out of the opening. I have won hundreds of games with this in blitz ... people always thinks its OK to just swap pieces ... and head for the endgame. 

    Of course, if you had attended Kolty's lectures, (or) bought his books, you would know what I am talking about. (G. Koltanowski was a good player, famous for his blindfold exhibitions.) 

    Only one way to sort this disagreement out.

  • 2 years ago · #82

    EbenezerDrood

    FLchessplayer wrote:
    pfren wrote:

    Uhhh, but OK. In that game Hoi is playing a French Rubinstein being (as white) a full tempo down (pushed the pawn to e4 in two moves instead of one).

    He is not worse, of course, but his win has absolutely nothing to do with the opening.

    Allow me (and Fritz!) to disagree. And (also) White gets a Q-side majority out of the opening. I have won hundreds of games with this in blitz ... people always thinks its OK to just swap pieces ... and head for the endgame. 

    Of course, if you had attended Kolty's lectures, (or) bought his books, you would know what I am talking about. (G. Koltanowski was a good player, famous for his blindfold exhibitions.) 

    Ken Smith & John Hall's book on the Colle gives a nice job of explaining how to play for a win out of the supposedly "stale and equal" Colle positions.  I feel like it's available for a quarter at every used book store in the universe.

  • 2 years ago · #83

    EbenezerDrood

    Scottrf wrote:
    FLchessplayer wrote:
    pfren wrote:

    Uhhh, but OK. In that game Hoi is playing a French Rubinstein being (as white) a full tempo down (pushed the pawn to e4 in two moves instead of one).

    He is not worse, of course, but his win has absolutely nothing to do with the opening.

    Allow me (and Fritz!) to disagree. And (also) White gets a Q-side majority out of the opening. I have won hundreds of games with this in blitz ... people always thinks its OK to just swap pieces ... and head for the endgame. 

    Of course, if you had attended Kolty's lectures, (or) bought his books, you would know what I am talking about. (G. Koltanowski was a good player, famous for his blindfold exhibitions.) 

    Only one way to sort this disagreement out.

    But this is no place for naked Sumo.

  • 2 years ago · #88

    jetfighter13

    The King's Gambit is easy enough, get the pieces pointing at f7 and then attack

  • 2 years ago · #91

    buckeyeball

    I am trying to learn Philadors defence. it kind of easy.

  • 2 years ago · #92

    The_Gavinator

    jetfighter13 wrote:

    The King's Gambit is easy enough, get the pieces pointing at f7 and then attack

    Bro stop with the King's Gambit, it is easy to stop and you throw away a pawn.

  • 2 years ago · #93

    EbenezerDrood

    The_Gavinator wrote:
    jetfighter13 wrote:

    The King's Gambit is easy enough, get the pieces pointing at f7 and then attack

    Bro stop with the King's Gambit, it is easy to stop and you throw away a pawn.

    As opposed to being easy to stop and throwing away a tempo?  Or two?  Or a queen?

  • 2 years ago · #94

    The_Gavinator

    What do you mean ebenezer drood, idk what you're even talking about?

  • 2 years ago · #95

    IrrationalTiger

    Why not just teach basic development with the idea of taking the center, instead of teaching systematic and robotic play in the opening (first we set up this structure, and only think thereafter)?  While I agree with you in that beginners will get crushed starting out in simple and open positions, it's better than having them only see one type of position and having a very shallow exposure to the basics of chess.  At the beginning stages of chess, shouldn't the opening almost be completely ignored other than basic principles, anyway?  Endgames, endgames, and more endgames are the best way to build a base for a new chess player - it's crucial to learn how the pieces work together instead of being told where to move them to get safely into the middlegame.

    It seems like there are two frequently employed methods of teaching chess these days to beginners - focusing on endgames and understanding how the pieces work with each other and focusing on flashy tactics and mates.  One produces a neverending stream of 1400s who play the King's Gambit and spend their whole career trying to get the Bxh7+ sacrifice, the other kills interest for some and creates strong masters out of the rest.

  • 2 years ago · #96

    jetfighter13

    yeah and just because you give away a pawn doesn't mean you don't get something in return, I tend to like the position I get in the KG, and if you would accept my challange (which I would never lower myself to those cheaters) I would show you that you get a dynamic advantage rather than a passive advantage

  • 2 years ago · #97

    jetfighter13

    and How is the KG easy to stop

  • 2 years ago · #98

    jetfighter13

    sure. I accept

  • 2 years ago · #100

    AlCzervik

    FLchessplayer wrote:
    jetfighter13 wrote:

    and How is the KG easy to stop?

     

    Play against Fritz 13, and you will be stopped cold ... every time. 

    Sure. If you're playing against a computer. Or a Master. For many non-masters, this is sound.


Back to Top
This forum topic has been locked.