12458 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The French Defence and the Caro-Kann defence are considered outright INFERIOR by a well-known GM COACH.
What do you think of it?
First off, "inferior" by what standard? By black's winning percentage? By Black's drawing percentage? By the radius of the Equator times a factor of (3*pi)? By how happy they make little children when they play them?Ignoring that "minor" detail, almost any discussion on openings or opening theory made by masters can be safely ignored by non-masters (something I wish I started doing much sooner myself). When you consider that even one move is enough to go from a better position to a worse one (or even losing), and that the average club player probably makes at least 4-5 '?!' mistakes or worse within his first 25 moves, it gives you some perspective on how much openings actually matter to non-masters.Aside from that, the French seems to have served guys like Short, Bareev, and Morozevich quite well. And guys like Anand and Shirov have trusted the Caro-Kann.And if they've worked for them, then they work for me (and I use both openings myself).
In caro-kann, pushing c6 hinders natural development of a knight at c6!
In the French, after e4-e6-d4-d5-Nc3, atleast the d4 pawn for White rests there controlling more center!
^^In the French, after e4-e6-d4-d5-Nc3, atleast the d4 pawn for White rests there controlling more center!^^
@kavanam but isn't it the same idea with hypermodern opnenings? To destroy White's center?
By that standard, all opening moves are bad, including any black response to 1.e4. Unless you're talking forced checkmating sequences, even the best moves (opening moves or otherwise) have their drawbacks to them. 1...e5 weakens the a2-g8 diagonal for black (and most importantly, f7) and gives white all sorts of potentially nasty attacking gambit lines as a result. 1...c5 doesn't develop the king side and makes it harder for black to play the 1.e4 "equalizing" move d5 later on. 1...d5 loses development time. 1...d6 and 1...g6 typically see black having less space. Etc., etc.All of this obscures and ignores the more relevant point that good moves are good precisely because their good points outweigh their bad ones, not because they contain absolutely zero drawbacks to them.
9/1/2015 - Reinforcements
by robertkeitz111 6 minutes ago
Chess rating system
by adamgold7 8 minutes ago
Who Is The Best Players In Chess History
by sixtyseventy 12 minutes ago
Playing Black against the Catalan
by pfren 19 minutes ago
Curious case of Wesley So
by ChessPatzer987 30 minutes ago
by baddogno 44 minutes ago
by cooldrool 67 minutes ago
Payed Membership verus Free Membership
by Caedrel 72 minutes ago
Who Will Win The 2015 Sinquefield Cup? And who will win Grand Chess Tour.
by pa_kamini 80 minutes ago
Faulty Opening book in chess.com
by rigamagician1959 80 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!