13425 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
For you French players (or experts on the French from the white side), what are your thoughts on these two repertoire options and how they differ?
I've been playing 3...Nf6 since I started with the French, so I wonder sometimes if I'm really missing out by not really learning to play the Winawer.
I definitely prefer playing the Steinitz myself. The Winawer is way too risky fo my taste...
I would advocate the Tarrasch instead. The tarrasch is uncommon, perfectly sound and is very positional.
I play the French with the black pieces, so I don't get to chose the Tarrasch in these circumstances.
Well, why not play the Rubenstein(3.dxe4)?
It is solid, used by GMs, sound and active too?
Could you post each opening here, I play French all the time but I'm not familiar with the variations
If interested in the Steinitz/McCutcheon complex, then a new book to recommend is "The Modern French" by GM Antic and IM Maksimovic in New In Chess Publications.
Definitely not a good book to learn the classical French, but a valuable tool for advanced players. Even myself find the variations tree chaotic, but there is no doubt that the authors have worked a lot on the subject.
I prefer the winawer french as black while my wife prefers the classical . As white I play the tarrasch against the french more than 3 Nc3 .
I believe the title of this thread should be the French Classical vs the French Winawer as the Steinitz is a variation that can be played against the classical french 4 e5
I always think of the classical french as including Bg5 Be7, so I forgot that everything after 3...Nf6 is still within the classical umbrella.
I guess I can't say either, I play 3...c5
Winawer is better than steinitz if you take time to study the lines...
No, it isn't.
I'd just play 3...Nf6 because the complications of 3...Bb4 seem like too much work.
It's all a matter of opinion
I prefer Nf6 for black, but do play the mccutcheon against bg5. I think the winawer is to crazy for me!
After 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5, is ...Ne4 good?
its called the pseudo-steinitz i believe, im quite interested in this as well
hmm, I don't think it is that great.
Given that you arrive at the same position as in the Tarrasch with 3...Nf6 4.e5 Ne4 after 5.Nxe4 dxe4 6.Bc4 which is considered to be good for White, and White also has other options, I can't see it being good.
by Basileus15 a few minutes ago
one word to describe chess.com crowd
by MuhammadAreez10 a few minutes ago
2001: A Space Odyssey....an Oddity??
by Eseles 3 minutes ago
Bishop, Knight & King versus King.
by Shakaali 3 minutes ago
"Back to Basics" Repertoire
by mosey69 6 minutes ago
by MuhammadAreez10 7 minutes ago
3/1/2015 - Compelled To Lose
by biat 8 minutes ago
King's Gambit a good opening?
by Hadron 8 minutes ago
by MuhammadAreez10 9 minutes ago
by OpiningTheoretician 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!